About: Trademark

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Trademark Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Trademark
is dcterms:subject of	NVST.com v. Nvest Universal City Studios v. Nintendo Philip Morris USA v. Otamedia U.S. v. Washington Mint Audi v. D'Amato Savin Corp. v. Savin Group Toys "R" Us v. Abir Mattel v. Internet Dimensions Independent Living Aids v. Maxi-Aids Louis Vuitton v. Veit Adobe v. One Stop Micro International Trademark Association Shields v. Zuccarini Trademark Technical and Conforming Amendment Act of 2010 Interstate Net Bank v. Netb@nk Telewizja Polska USA v. Echostar Satellite Priority International Profit Associates v. Paisola Advertise.com v. AOL Advertising Actmedia v. Active Media International Morrison & Foerster v. Wick Notice of publication Madison Ave. Caviarteria v. Caviaria.com Promatek v. Equitrac Nintendo of America v. Bung Enterprises S&L Vitamins v. Australian Gold Global Trustmark Alliance Eurotech v. Cosmos European Travels Autodesk v. Dassault Systemes Biocryst Pharmaceuticals v. Namecheap.com NBC Universal v. NBCUniversal.com Trademark use Bird v. Parsons Current Communications Group v. Current Media Rasmussen v. General Growth Properties Mele v. Davidson & Associates DaimlerChrysler v. The Net Motorola v. CheechInc. Hickory Farms v. Snackmasters Roger Cleveland Golf v. Prince Investools v. Investtools.com Lamparello v. Falwell Blue Planet Software v. Games International Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005 Trademark registrant Arkansas Best v. Carolina Freight In re 1800Mattress.com Saturn Corp. v. Saturn Service Phonespell v. Rugh Brand name Notice of abandonment Retail Services v. Freebies Publishing Hamzik v. Zale Lighthouse Plastics, LLC v. Lighthouse Plastics, LLC Rescuecom v. Google Aztar v. MGM Casino Final refusal Corporate brand Statement of Use Boxcar Media v. Redneckjunk Counterfeit SB Designs v. Reebok Int’l Confusing similarity Licensee Data Concepts v. Digital Consulting Licensor Buying for the Home v. Humble Abode Yahoo! v. Kay Edgar Online v. Parisi In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP Penn Warranty v. DiGiovanni Registral.com v. Fisher Controls Trade-Mark Cases Trademark disclaimer Logo Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels v. Building Champions Davies v. Afilias Ticket Solutions v. Banks Initial interest confusion Santa Fe Properties v. French & French Fine Properties Exclusion order HQM v. Hatfield AOL v. AOL.org Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Karpachev IPAustralia Fryer v. Brown Merck v. Mediplan Washington Speakers Bureau v. Leading Authorities Midway Manufacturing v. Publications International Newsguy v. Yomtobian Mattel v. McBride Becoming v. Avon Entrepreneur Media v. Smith Patent and Trademark Resource Center Graham & Buffet v. www.vilcabamba.com Northland Insurance v. Blaylock Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984 Microsoft v. Software Wholesale Club

Attributes

Values

rdfs:label

Trademark

is dcterms:subject of

NVST.com v. Nvest
Universal City Studios v. Nintendo
Philip Morris USA v. Otamedia
U.S. v. Washington Mint
Audi v. D'Amato
Savin Corp. v. Savin Group
Toys "R" Us v. Abir
Mattel v. Internet Dimensions
Independent Living Aids v. Maxi-Aids
Louis Vuitton v. Veit
Adobe v. One Stop Micro
International Trademark Association
Shields v. Zuccarini
Trademark Technical and Conforming Amendment Act of 2010
Interstate Net Bank v. Netb@nk
Telewizja Polska USA v. Echostar Satellite
Priority
International Profit Associates v. Paisola
Advertise.com v. AOL Advertising
Actmedia v. Active Media International
Morrison & Foerster v. Wick
Notice of publication
Madison Ave. Caviarteria v. Caviaria.com
Promatek v. Equitrac
Nintendo of America v. Bung Enterprises
S&L Vitamins v. Australian Gold
Global Trustmark Alliance
Eurotech v. Cosmos European Travels
Autodesk v. Dassault Systemes
Biocryst Pharmaceuticals v. Namecheap.com
NBC Universal v. NBCUniversal.com
Trademark use
Bird v. Parsons
Current Communications Group v. Current Media
Rasmussen v. General Growth Properties
Mele v. Davidson & Associates
DaimlerChrysler v. The Net
Motorola v. CheechInc.
Hickory Farms v. Snackmasters
Roger Cleveland Golf v. Prince
Investools v. Investtools.com
Lamparello v. Falwell
Blue Planet Software v. Games International
Family Entertainment and Copyright Act of 2005
Trademark registrant
Arkansas Best v. Carolina Freight
In re 1800Mattress.com
Saturn Corp. v. Saturn Service
Phonespell v. Rugh
Brand name
Notice of abandonment
Retail Services v. Freebies Publishing
Hamzik v. Zale
Lighthouse Plastics, LLC v. Lighthouse Plastics, LLC
Rescuecom v. Google
Aztar v. MGM Casino
Final refusal
Corporate brand
Statement of Use
Boxcar Media v. Redneckjunk
Counterfeit
SB Designs v. Reebok Int’l
Confusing similarity
Licensee
Data Concepts v. Digital Consulting
Licensor
Buying for the Home v. Humble Abode
Yahoo! v. Kay
Edgar Online v. Parisi
In re Oppedahl & Larson LLP
Penn Warranty v. DiGiovanni
Registral.com v. Fisher Controls
Trade-Mark Cases
Trademark disclaimer
Logo
Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels v. Building Champions
Davies v. Afilias
Ticket Solutions v. Banks
Initial interest confusion
Santa Fe Properties v. French & French Fine Properties
Exclusion order
HQM v. Hatfield
AOL v. AOL.org
Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Karpachev
IPAustralia
Fryer v. Brown
Merck v. Mediplan
Washington Speakers Bureau v. Leading Authorities
Midway Manufacturing v. Publications International
Newsguy v. Yomtobian
Mattel v. McBride
Becoming v. Avon
Entrepreneur Media v. Smith
Patent and Trademark Resource Center
Graham & Buffet v. www.vilcabamba.com
Northland Insurance v. Blaylock
Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property
Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984
Microsoft v. Software Wholesale Club

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software