About: We can't have it both ways? I beg to differ.

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: We can't have it both ways? I beg to differ. Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

by user Mcs81986 Most who attack the Democrats interchange the words "troops" and "mission" in such a way to demonize those who don't support the current situation in Iraq. So I feel it's necessary to clarify. I absolutely support the troops. I would like to see them out of harms way. I would like to see them home, safe, and with their families. So because I don't want these troops to be part of this mistake of a mission, that makes against the troops? No, that makes me against the mission. See? There's a difference. I can have it both ways. __NOEDITSECTION__

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	We can't have it both ways? I beg to differ.
rdfs:comment	by user Mcs81986 Most who attack the Democrats interchange the words "troops" and "mission" in such a way to demonize those who don't support the current situation in Iraq. So I feel it's necessary to clarify. I absolutely support the troops. I would like to see them out of harms way. I would like to see them home, safe, and with their families. So because I don't want these troops to be part of this mistake of a mission, that makes against the troops? No, that makes me against the mission. See? There's a difference. I can have it both ways. __NOEDITSECTION__
dcterms:subject	Opinions dbkwik:resource/pFCZ1oIFf48PCLA5AbFVig== dbkwik:resource/2NHmMey2cTSNDji4mBnHFA== dbkwik:resource/fkrm5zdqQz72vo9o5_EtnA== dbkwik:resource/HePGY17IllfuJ20ovtxsEA== dbkwik:resource/ValMh6mvIhY4LQ6jqjZHGg== dbkwik:resource/0hTdSdfi_c4317VCUFCXOA== dbkwik:resource/AHlTYbo7-vQPW7prO-u3dA==
dbkwik:opinion/pro...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/u-jz-Av2mHR2nunt676rtQ==
abstract	by user Mcs81986 Most who attack the Democrats interchange the words "troops" and "mission" in such a way to demonize those who don't support the current situation in Iraq. So I feel it's necessary to clarify. Is breaking down random doors in hopes to find insurgents any sort of quality strategy? What about adding more troops to try to defeat people who aren't afraid to die? What about sending more troops into an area where both sides of the "civil war", Sunnis and Shiites, feel that it's alright to attack foreign troops? We're putting troops in harms way. I don't support that strategy. I don't support that mission. I absolutely support the troops. I would like to see them out of harms way. I would like to see them home, safe, and with their families. So because I don't want these troops to be part of this mistake of a mission, that makes against the troops? No, that makes me against the mission. See? There's a difference. I can have it both ways. What about those who attack the Democrats? These people who claim to be the only ones who support the troops, unlike those evil, terrible, "I hate America" Democrats. These are the same people who feel it necessary to send Americans into a dangerous area with a plan that has no chance at complete success. These are the same people who ensure quality care for those injured during this mission and then supply them poor conditions are unkempt facilities such as Walter Reed. I can clearly see now which side is the true supporter of the troops in . __NOEDITSECTION__ From The Opinion Wiki, a Wikia wiki. From The Opinion Wiki, a Wikia wiki.

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software