About: Star Wars Fanon:High Priests   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbkwik:resource/_oyQKPcBSZR9S_xP9erLCA==, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The High Priests were a group of users that read over, checked and reviewed good article nominations, as well as oversaw good articles to ensure they were up to standards, before voting as to whether or not good article status should be given to an article. The High Priests reviewed and gave constructive criticism for articles until they were fixed up to meet good article requirements, and once those criticisms were rectified then the High Priests voted on whether or not the article should have become a good article. In order to become a good article, at least four High Priests must have approved, along with ten general community voters.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Star Wars Fanon:High Priests
rdfs:comment
  • The High Priests were a group of users that read over, checked and reviewed good article nominations, as well as oversaw good articles to ensure they were up to standards, before voting as to whether or not good article status should be given to an article. The High Priests reviewed and gave constructive criticism for articles until they were fixed up to meet good article requirements, and once those criticisms were rectified then the High Priests voted on whether or not the article should have become a good article. In order to become a good article, at least four High Priests must have approved, along with ten general community voters.
bg
  • 4682(xsd:integer)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:swfanon/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
Affiliation
Name
  • High Priests
Members
  • *Brandon Rhea *Darth tom *Drewton *Gnosis is knowledge *Jedi Master 76 *MPK *Xepeyon‎
Founder
  • *Brandon Rhea *CurrentBigThing *Darth tader *Gnosis is knowledge *Jedi Master 76
Dissolved
  • 2008-09-25(xsd:date)
Founded
  • 2007-05-28(xsd:date)
abstract
  • The High Priests were a group of users that read over, checked and reviewed good article nominations, as well as oversaw good articles to ensure they were up to standards, before voting as to whether or not good article status should be given to an article. The High Priests reviewed and gave constructive criticism for articles until they were fixed up to meet good article requirements, and once those criticisms were rectified then the High Priests voted on whether or not the article should have become a good article. In order to become a good article, at least four High Priests must have approved, along with ten general community voters. Good articles were checked over by the High Priests periodically to ensure that they still warranted the status that it was given. If the article did not warrant keeping its good article status, a majority vote of the High Priests could have stripped it of the status and make it a . The article could have regained its status only after the complaints of the High Priests had been corrected and it was approved on the nominations track once again. It should be noted that the only good articles the High Priests would review were those that were not featured articles at the same time, as it was assumed that if the article was a featured article then it was well beyond good article standards. At the time of the dissolution of the High Priests, Star Wars Fanon had seven former good articles compared to nearly one hundred good articles.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software