About: Articles for deletion/List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series)   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

All the information already present at the main horribly written article C.I.D. (TV series). Then why not be bold and redirect it or raise a Merge request instead of deletion? That's because i dont think even a redirect is necessary when readers can directly find the info on the main article and main article would be the primary search topic. (I had tagged it with CSD A10 yesterday but the tag was removed and contested by User:Monty845 with reason that "2011 is not recently created". I hold the opinion that whensoever created if it is duplicate, it can be deleted under CSD A10. And "recent" is a relative term. If i was 90yrs old, 2011 would have been recent for me. Anyways... Just wanted to point out that a speedy deletion of the article was contested.) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:38, 17

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Articles for deletion/List of characters in C.I.D. (TV series)
rdfs:comment
  • All the information already present at the main horribly written article C.I.D. (TV series). Then why not be bold and redirect it or raise a Merge request instead of deletion? That's because i dont think even a redirect is necessary when readers can directly find the info on the main article and main article would be the primary search topic. (I had tagged it with CSD A10 yesterday but the tag was removed and contested by User:Monty845 with reason that "2011 is not recently created". I hold the opinion that whensoever created if it is duplicate, it can be deleted under CSD A10. And "recent" is a relative term. If i was 90yrs old, 2011 would have been recent for me. Anyways... Just wanted to point out that a speedy deletion of the article was contested.) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:38, 17
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • All the information already present at the main horribly written article C.I.D. (TV series). Then why not be bold and redirect it or raise a Merge request instead of deletion? That's because i dont think even a redirect is necessary when readers can directly find the info on the main article and main article would be the primary search topic. (I had tagged it with CSD A10 yesterday but the tag was removed and contested by User:Monty845 with reason that "2011 is not recently created". I hold the opinion that whensoever created if it is duplicate, it can be deleted under CSD A10. And "recent" is a relative term. If i was 90yrs old, 2011 would have been recent for me. Anyways... Just wanted to point out that a speedy deletion of the article was contested.) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:38, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software