About: Forum:SH Archive/Image formatting   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Do we have a policy on the correct way to format image info? I know we need to include a summary, a source and licensing info, but I assumed they needed to be separated by headers. Imp seems to be incorporating summary and source into one section, however. Anything? - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Forum:SH Archive/Image formatting
rdfs:comment
  • Do we have a policy on the correct way to format image info? I know we need to include a summary, a source and licensing info, but I assumed they needed to be separated by headers. Imp seems to be incorporating summary and source into one section, however. Anything? - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Do we have a policy on the correct way to format image info? I know we need to include a summary, a source and licensing info, but I assumed they needed to be separated by headers. Imp seems to be incorporating summary and source into one section, however. Anything? - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC) * I'm just doing it because that's how the upload system does it by default. Although Wikia may add a "source" field soon, which would be cool. Anyway, this will be covered by the proposed image policy we're writing (or will write this weekend). --Imp 21:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC) * Ah, excellent - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 21:56, 15 November 2006 (UTC) * I just saw this image template at wikimedia commons. Maybe we could start to implement it here. 19:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC) * I copied it over to . Should we keep the "Date" field? And perhaps we should make the "Author" field optional, seeing as most images we use are either promotional or screenshots. --Imp 22:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC) * Good idea. And an excellent template. One thing though: do we add Licensing info to the "Permission field", and if so, are some of the licensing temples going to be reduced in size? Ones such as might make this template a bit unwieldly - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 22:06, 19 November 2006 (UTC) * I think I'll play around with it some. We can enable auto-hiding for non-essential fields like author and date. --Xwing328(Talk) 22:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC) * OK, I deleted "date". How many image creation dates do we actually know? Probably <1%. Author is now optional, since we don't know who created most of the images we use. Also, I made the variables lowercase, since they are case sensitive, and that's the style we use on Wookieepedia. If we could work this in to the image upload pages that would be neat. --Xwing328(Talk) 22:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC) * A perfect request for Forum:Wiki feature requests. Oh, and is it possible to place licensing templates within this template? That would be sort of neat. --Imp 23:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC) * Yes it is possible, sizing may be an issue on some, but I'm going to experiment with it later. There was a slight code glitch earlier also. --Xwing328(Talk) 03:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software