abstract
| - This looks like a clear violation of Crystal to me and there isn't enough verified information to hang an article on. I suggest that we redirect this to Keisha Buchanan and cover the subject there until there is more to say. Spartaz Humbug! 03:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
* Speedy delete per WP:CRYSTAL under CSD A7 without redirect. while it may be proper to include the subject within Keisha Buchanan's BLP, it is not possible to predict notability for stand alone status unless there were significant pre-production sales. My76Strat (talk) 04:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
* Merge and redirect Don't think it qualifies for a speedy. I created the article because it meets the GNG, but I agree that it should be redirected (for now). There is absolutely no reason to speedy delete it. Till I Go Home talk stalk 04:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
* (edit conflict) Merge and redirect to Keisha_Buchanan#2010.E2.80.93present:_Solo_career_and_reforming_Sugababes This information can fit perfectly in her main article. That section specifically. The redirect could come in use if someone were to look up the term "Keisha Buchanan's debut album". Statυs (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
* Delete per WP:HAMMER. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
* Putting aside that 'law', what benefit is gained from deleting the whole article? What's wrong with a simple merge and redirect to the artist in question? Till I Go Home talk 03:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
|