About: RNC Wiki Hosting Issues   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

A "true wiki" allows for completely open editing - where anybody, including anonymous editors, to make changes. This openness means that vandalism and other uncontrolled stuff happens. Can RNC live with this?

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RNC Wiki Hosting Issues
rdfs:comment
  • A "true wiki" allows for completely open editing - where anybody, including anonymous editors, to make changes. This openness means that vandalism and other uncontrolled stuff happens. Can RNC live with this?
dcterms:subject
abstract
  • A "true wiki" allows for completely open editing - where anybody, including anonymous editors, to make changes. This openness means that vandalism and other uncontrolled stuff happens. Can RNC live with this? Geoph: I feel perfectly comfortable using a "not-so-true wiki," i.e., allowing completely open to editing by anyone on the committee, or perhaps even anyone in the FIC (i'm open for discussion on this). If we switch this over to the FIC website as mentioned below, won't that limit who can log on and use it? Conversely, didn't Craig mention that it was possible to do something like a wiki which is accessible only to folks who have a password?
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software