| rdfs:comment
| - In light of the new information we are receiving, and the amount of information available currently available, I am proposing that we separate tonraq and senna into two separate pages. considering that much of tonraq's information is relavent to his brother, and not his wife, i think the page should be seperated, so senna's info isn't mixed into the unalaq/tonraq stuff. Intelligence4 (wall • contribs) You do realize this has been proposed before right? The consensus was to leave the pages merged. Shadow☆Star 11:29, July 2, 2013 (UTC)
|
| abstract
| - In light of the new information we are receiving, and the amount of information available currently available, I am proposing that we separate tonraq and senna into two separate pages. considering that much of tonraq's information is relavent to his brother, and not his wife, i think the page should be seperated, so senna's info isn't mixed into the unalaq/tonraq stuff. Intelligence4 (wall • contribs) You do realize this has been proposed before right? The consensus was to leave the pages merged. Shadow☆Star 11:29, July 2, 2013 (UTC) not after the new info we recieved yesterday. besides, they will have to be seperated at some point - no other couples share a page if there is plenty of info on each half (katara and aang, hakoda and kya, ect). Intelligence4 (wall • contribs) I agree, I think that with more information on a single character it's ok to split the two pages now. Book 2 could be coming in a month or five, we honestly don't know how long it takes. It's likely that we'll be given even more information at SDCC, probably some more on Senna and Tonraq, giving us more reason to split them than we already have. I figure it'd be easy to do it now so we can make those edits then and have an up-to-date wiki, also to make the article more focussed on its subject, and it would remove the odd random tidbits about Tonraq from the article. So yeah, I guess I support the proposal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FireFerret (wall • contribs) 05:21, 3 July 2013 I, on the other hand, would have to disagree. If we were to separate the pages, almost all the information on Senna's page would be a duplication of information taken from Tonraq's page, so I don't see there is any real gain from splitting them. Also, regarding the argument that we might get information in the future; that is, frankly, irrelevant. If we do get extra info at SDCC, or new info is revealed at some time in the future, then the pages can be split then; we should not make a decision now based on the judgement that we might potentially get new information in the future which would justify that action. The judgement should be based on the here and now, the information we have at the moment, and in my opinion, what we have now is not enough to justify the split. 07:32, July 3, 2013 (UTC) Per HoT: there is no pressing need as of yet to split the pages, and the fact that Senna's page would then be basically a complete copy/paste of Tonraq's is more unprofessional than having the pages combined a bit longer until we have more information. The pages will be split when the time comes. Imo, that's not now. 23:35, July 4, 2013 (UTC) there are several pages on here that are very short, and would be shorter than senna's article. Intelligence4 (wall • contribs) The issue I was referring to wasn't regarding the length, but that it would be just a duplication of the same information. Also, the fact that we have other pages that are shorter is irrelevant; a page is judged on its own merits, not based on other pages. I stand by my opinion. 13:18, July 7, 2013 (UTC) I stand with the opposition. Two clones of the same page look icky. XIII 19:52, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)