| rdfs:comment
| - Heh, that's really nice. Itd be cool if you could post WHERE to get the skill too though. Image:Ni sig.JPGNi 13:56, 26 April 2007 (CEST) thx. and yeah its a good idea, not quite sure how to fix it, but that will eliminate need of any external skill database. gcardinal 14:04, 26 April 2007 (CEST) What's the data source for whenever skill rebalancing occurs? Will it be user maintainable, or require server access, or pull from some external source? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:39, 26 April 2007 (CEST) gwBBcode is usually external - whenever gwshack updates theirs, we'll be able to get the update. -Auron 16:43, 26 April 2007 (CEST) But that's the root of my question ... this tool is "It's mostly based on gwBBcode but fully customized and partly re-written for the Wiki use". Are th
|
| abstract
| - Heh, that's really nice. Itd be cool if you could post WHERE to get the skill too though. Image:Ni sig.JPGNi 13:56, 26 April 2007 (CEST) thx. and yeah its a good idea, not quite sure how to fix it, but that will eliminate need of any external skill database. gcardinal 14:04, 26 April 2007 (CEST) What's the data source for whenever skill rebalancing occurs? Will it be user maintainable, or require server access, or pull from some external source? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:39, 26 April 2007 (CEST) gwBBcode is usually external - whenever gwshack updates theirs, we'll be able to get the update. -Auron 16:43, 26 April 2007 (CEST) But that's the root of my question ... this tool is "It's mostly based on gwBBcode but fully customized and partly re-written for the Wiki use". Are the customizations stricly in layout so that it can still be based on the gwBBcode database tables, or will some or all of the customizations require a new custom database? At the very least, the suggested change above to list where to get the skill won't be part of gwBBcode - with the GW:EotN expansion, the list of where to get elites could likely require updates. Other customizations to the code may require similar updates. That's why I asked. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:56, 26 April 2007 (CEST) I like this! 17:11, 26 April 2007 (CEST) You spelt "profession" wrong. — Skuld 18:14, 26 April 2007 (CEST) Yeah, might be worth pluralizing logo while you're at it. 19:04, 26 April 2007 (CEST) and BBCode = Dead ATM. Image:Ni sig.JPGNi 21:14, 26 April 2007 (CEST) It's the same as on the guild forums, just add around it. Thus: [build prof=W/A swo=11+3=1 tac=3+1 str=10+1 dead=3][Enraging Charge][Sprint][Crippling Slash][Shadow Prison][Resurrection Signet][/build] Um... Maybe? XD Ok, what happened to that? 21:39, 26 April 2007 (CEST) Sweet! Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg *Defiant Elements* +talk 21:16, 26 April 2007 (CEST) Hi guys, gwbbcode are dead yeah, getting ready for new extension. When it comes to updates gwBBcode did a really amazing job, even code are somewhere hard to understand its sure made in the best sense of open source and is extremely easy to update. Even most parts of they code was changed to adjust to wiki it wont be a problem when update comes out. When I will get more time I will clean up the code and will hold updated private svn for easy updates. Currently Im working on converter that will covert old style build-wiki to new one. gcardinal 21:51, 26 April 2007 (CEST) That sounds cool. When can we expect it? (And the bbcode, too, if you have an estimate.) 21:59, 26 April 2007 (CEST) I think it will be online in next 24 hours, I just really want to get converter up and running at the same time. When it comes to gwbbcode it will be removed. There will be pvxbig for big posting (like in preview), pvxsmall for addition build variants and pvxmicro for the smallest posts (last one will be without floating description) gcardinal 22:07, 26 April 2007 (CEST) That's good. BB seems to be working for the moment (as seen above). How different will it be from the BBcoding, typing-wise? I'm wondering how much we'll have to change userpages, etc. 22:38, 26 April 2007 (CEST) The only change will the tag. What is between will be the same. Extension will control what kind of output that will be produced. gcardinal 00:15, 27 April 2007 (CEST) That's definitely good! Can't wait! 07:05, 27 April 2007 (CEST) The only thing I see that I don't like is the little blob of yellow/gold on the end of the part that gives the campaign it's from. 07:11, 27 April 2007 (CEST) Ok, I will remove it. The idea was to have to change color for different copmaigns, but ended up just like that :) gcardinal 09:30, 27 April 2007 (CEST)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)