| rdfs:comment
| - Phew, took some time and work. Comments? 00:27, January 27, 2016 (UTC) Wow that was quick ^^ This is probably going to be quite a bit of work, sorry, but could you add citations to the description? For example, in the Battle Against BloodClan and the Battle Against the Dark Forest, and in other events, like the Journey to Find Sol, there are cites in all sections, including the first 1-2 summary sentences, the premise, the overview, etc. 01:07 Wed Jan 27 Agreed. 23:51, January 31, 2016 (UTC) Done sorry I took so long. 07:35, February 4, 2016 (UTC) Updated 07:13, February 23, 2016 (UTC)
|
| abstract
| - Phew, took some time and work. Comments? 00:27, January 27, 2016 (UTC) Wow that was quick ^^ This is probably going to be quite a bit of work, sorry, but could you add citations to the description? For example, in the Battle Against BloodClan and the Battle Against the Dark Forest, and in other events, like the Journey to Find Sol, there are cites in all sections, including the first 1-2 summary sentences, the premise, the overview, etc. 01:07 Wed Jan 27 I'm clinchy about doing the cites is that even a word? I mean I did BloodClan and Sol, and that was ridiculously tiresome and hard. I think there needs to be a discussion about where to have cites first because it being everywhere is not a great idea I think. 01:16, January 27, 2016 (UTC) imo cites are needed... if nothing else I think there should be a cite per paragraph, that could simply cite the chapter that it was from (I've never really thought that citing exact pages was necessary). Anyways, what does everyone else think about having cites for events? 23:44 Sat Jan 30 I'll concede to not everywhere, but descriptions absolutely. It's like a description of a character; it's the description of the background. 06:34, January 31, 2016 (UTC) Agreed. 23:51, January 31, 2016 (UTC) Done sorry I took so long. 07:35, February 4, 2016 (UTC) I still think that cites for the main description part (premise and overview) should be added. Although the other sections are fine without, I think that since the main description has the most important events, they should be cited. 22:44 Thu Feb 4 Hmm, I'd like a second opinion on that please. 20:27, February 8, 2016 (UTC) So what are everyone else's opinions on this? 20:11 Sat Feb 13 I think the article is fine as of now. 03:40, February 18, 2016 (UTC) I very much agree with Mapleclaw. They are correct when they say it contains the most important events, and it should be cited. We cite character descriptions, do we not? We also cite a lot of information in other PW articles. This should be no different, just because it's a lot of work. Maple has said more than once that it should be cited, and "it's a lot of work" doesn't seem like a good reason not to do it. It's all from one book, so it's not like you'd need to go through the entire Dawn of the Clans arc. Updated 07:13, February 23, 2016 (UTC) Thanks for getting that done. Could you add a main quote? you don't need to, but I know that there's one for the Battle against BloodClan. 23:31 Tue Feb 23 Updated 04:41, February 24, 2016 (UTC) Comments before vote? 02:24 Sat Feb 27 Vote's up! 21:23 Sun Feb 28
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)