About: Forum:SH Archive/Years with info on Users

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Forum:SH Archive/Years with info on Users Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Many users say their date of birth on their page-- could we add a part to that year that says something like "user: was born"? If it's just taking up space anyway, shouldn't we add the info on users there? --DarthCow--Talk|Email

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Forum:SH Archive/Years with info on Users
rdfs:comment	Many users say their date of birth on their page-- could we add a part to that year that says something like "user: was born"? If it's just taking up space anyway, shouldn't we add the info on users there? --DarthCow--Talk\|Email
dcterms:subject	Senate Hall archive
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/L7DXtd-sJX1yevT-eiPA-Q== dbkwik:resource/HymlM2HsjSB8e6UsW1U-5Q==
abstract	Many users say their date of birth on their page-- could we add a part to that year that says something like "user: was born"? If it's just taking up space anyway, shouldn't we add the info on users there? --DarthCow--Talk\|Email * No, I don't think we should do that. We're not notable enough. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:50, 2 May 2006 (UTC) * I just think that would be better than just leaving it empty... * Yeah, I agree with Darth Cow. --AnakinSolo 23:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC) * And I agree with Silly Dan. It's hard enough trying to convince people that this isn't a place for fanwank and self-aggrandizement without us putting our birthyears everywhere. jSarek 00:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC) * Exactly: adding the birthdate of our own users (even the site founders and the editors who've been published in What's The Story?) would come off as extremely egotistical. (Besides, allowing for a 2-3 year production schedule, we have an actual Star Wars related event that we could put in for every year since 1974, so the empty pages are fixable with useful information.) —Silly Dan (talk) 01:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC) * In complete agreement with Dan. Under no circumstances should we clutter up articles with information about non-notables, including ourselves. — SavageBob 16:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC) * Agreed. -- Ozzel 18:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC) * I agree with Darth Cow. —Unsigned comment by Darth Chicken Joe (talk • contribs). * I don't think it is a good idea as it is essentially unrelated to Star Wars. --Eyrezer 22:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC) * We are not that important you know. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software