rdfs:comment
| - His grandfather invented dial-a-prayer in the 1950s (take that youtube!). His father, a Presbyterian minister, was the General Manager of the Community Service Society of New York, and helped them transition from case work to community work. His mother is a social worker, his brother was involved in politics and is actively involved with nonprofits in LA, and his sister is a teacher, working with special needs kids.
|
abstract
| - His grandfather invented dial-a-prayer in the 1950s (take that youtube!). His father, a Presbyterian minister, was the General Manager of the Community Service Society of New York, and helped them transition from case work to community work. His mother is a social worker, his brother was involved in politics and is actively involved with nonprofits in LA, and his sister is a teacher, working with special needs kids. His parents encouraged him to be out and engaged in the community, and by the time he was twelve, he was a peer tutor and worked with mentally disabled kids. Granted, he was partly motivated by a desire to get out of the house and do things on his own, but he got this bug to be “part of a community of actors who are trying to create a better world. And once you get that bug,” he said, “it’s hard to shake.” Jed tells Paul about other key influences: Min Yasui who taught him to be clear about his values and beliefs, and to fight for them in a way that’s affirming and positive for the broader community; and George Roberts, who gave him the resources to explore the areas of social entrepreneurship and venture philanthropy, at a time when the major players thought that the idea of integrating social and business practice was ridiculous. And in the best tradition of none-of-your-business journalism, Paul gets Jed to talk about favorite books, music, and hobbies (playing guitar, and rescuing stranded skiers). “The best thing is nobody cares about my academic work or my investing practices - it’s simply can you tie a knot, and get somebody in a litter and get them out of there.” Getting into his work for a few minutes, Paul asks Jed about the LA Times expose into the investing practices of the Gates Foundation, and how they may be causing the problems that the foundation hopes to fix. “What’s striking is that you can do that analysis on virtually every foundation in the United States and reach the same conclusion.” What we’re really working with is a business model that says we’re going to take 5% of our assets to pursue 100% of our mission, and 95% of our assets are going to be invested in some of the very companies that often create the problems that we’re trying to address with our 5%. This whole approach to philanthropy is absurd, Jed said. We should question this type of corporate structure that doesn’t pay taxes and receives very positive tax considerations under our current code. What we should ask is “are there ways that you can manage the 95% to support your mission?” That’s really the challenge. Jed advises Bill & Melinda to at least begin to more actively exercise their rights as shareholders to engage management in a dialogue into whether or not corporate practices are producing the maximum possible value. They could also learn some lessons from companies that in the past five to ten years have figured out how to manage assets in a way that gives greater consideration to social and environmental factors, and still maximizes financial returns. And they should question the idea that the sole purpose of philanthropic dollars is to make grants. Jed also has some advice for those of us who don’t own the planet, but want to do good anyway: (1) When in doubt, go higher – we all sometimes doubt what it is we’re doing. We need to keep our heads up and our eyes focused on the broader vision and value that we’re trying to create, and always strive to achieve the greatness that is within each of us. (2) Do a Gandhi – always expect the most of “the other” – in our personal lives and professional work, we should always expect everyone to perform at a very high level, professionally and ethically. If they choose to go beneath that, that’s something they have to deal with.
|