Is it just me, or is it very suspicious that FF IX has gotten to many votes from so many anonymous people? Maybe I'm just being a little too paranoid. Diablocon 18:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC) It's also suspicious that only votes from registered users count. --Auron Kaizer 18:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Hehe, I know. Still, makes me wonder if someone is intentionally flooding the votes anyway for the hell of it. Diablocon 18:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Don't look at me. Had I thought this was a good idea for the FFWiki, I would have semi-protected it from the start. --Hecko X 18:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) It's probably you Hecko ^_O --Auron Kaizer 19:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Nah, my IP is 80.something, and I don't have one of those change IP-thingies. But seriously, to have this kind
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Final Fantasy Wiki talk:Coolest thing ever!/archive
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Is it just me, or is it very suspicious that FF IX has gotten to many votes from so many anonymous people? Maybe I'm just being a little too paranoid. Diablocon 18:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC) It's also suspicious that only votes from registered users count. --Auron Kaizer 18:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Hehe, I know. Still, makes me wonder if someone is intentionally flooding the votes anyway for the hell of it. Diablocon 18:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Don't look at me. Had I thought this was a good idea for the FFWiki, I would have semi-protected it from the start. --Hecko X 18:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) It's probably you Hecko ^_O --Auron Kaizer 19:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Nah, my IP is 80.something, and I don't have one of those change IP-thingies. But seriously, to have this kind
|
| dbkwik:final-fanta...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dbkwik:finalfantas...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Text
| - While im all for this. the coolest thing ever page has been a lil too cluster w/ one vote wonders. I believe we should simply delete any nomination that has less than 3 votes Of course, we should give it a free period to see if any1 else votes for it and then it's gone if it doesn't have the votes. Gone as in, Finito! Never coming back!
Right now we can delete the topics for Ark, black mage, Dragoon, Edea, Eden, FFIV, Rikku, Wolf in the woods, and Vincent Valentine. Some maybes could be Gunblades, Red Mage and " "No. Mr. Thou is THAT one! Over THERE!"
- Why was my vote for FFIV called idiotic and removed?
|
| Time
| |
| abstract
| - Is it just me, or is it very suspicious that FF IX has gotten to many votes from so many anonymous people? Maybe I'm just being a little too paranoid. Diablocon 18:25, 13 February 2007 (UTC) It's also suspicious that only votes from registered users count. --Auron Kaizer 18:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Hehe, I know. Still, makes me wonder if someone is intentionally flooding the votes anyway for the hell of it. Diablocon 18:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Don't look at me. Had I thought this was a good idea for the FFWiki, I would have semi-protected it from the start. --Hecko X 18:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC) It's probably you Hecko ^_O --Auron Kaizer 19:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Nah, my IP is 80.something, and I don't have one of those change IP-thingies. But seriously, to have this kind of wote off, for registered user only, when we only have 6-7 actually active users, seems kind of... not smart. The idea was stolen from the Wookieepedia, and it was a good idea for them, since they have hundreds and hundreds of active users. Here, we could have 7 different topics and done deal, nothing we couldn't already have read on the active users' userpages, while on the wookie, it actually is interesting to see who/what gets the most votes. This is why I generally dislike when people steal ideas from other places, since people often forget to think it through. --Hecko X 19:23, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Hmm..you're right. What say we quit now and let Dancing Mad win by default? :P --Auron Kaizer 19:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Meh. The situation is out of hand, I'm just gonna let it slide. And if it is true that most anons love FFIX, then I guess the game isn't so underrated after all. --Crazyswordsman 19:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC) Its not really important. Even if one or two people totally screw up the results, what is the end result? Nothing. --TacticAngel 01:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC) Some idiot said the decimal count was annoying them, when the intro clearly states that that is because if you vote more than once, your vote is divided. Oh my God... Chocobo Knight 19:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)