rdfs:comment
| - This page is where you can nominate, discuss, and vote for new Uncyclopedian awards. It used to be that awards could be created willy nilly, but as the number of Uncyclopedian awards increase, its becoming clear that a system for creating each award is necessary. If you create an award and you don't run it by here, or you do and it doesn't pass, do not fear! You may still make it a minor award and it still may be distributed to people, it will just not carry as much esteem (which as you may be able to tell is a big part of Uncyclopedia, along with seriousness and formality). Every major award however, must include the following:
|
abstract
| - This page is where you can nominate, discuss, and vote for new Uncyclopedian awards. It used to be that awards could be created willy nilly, but as the number of Uncyclopedian awards increase, its becoming clear that a system for creating each award is necessary. If you create an award and you don't run it by here, or you do and it doesn't pass, do not fear! You may still make it a minor award and it still may be distributed to people, it will just not carry as much esteem (which as you may be able to tell is a big part of Uncyclopedia, along with seriousness and formality). Every major award however, must include the following:
* A good image that isn't voted to be crappy bad
* A template which doesn't break the layout of Uncyclopedia, or look really bad
* A clearly defined purpose which differs in some way from another, already created/nominated award
* A name and short abbreviation (usually an acronym) which doesn't conflict with any other awards When voting for an award, the following must be decided:
* What is the awards rank number?
* What is the final image for the award?
* What is the final template/caption for the award?
* What is the awards purpose?
* What is the awards name and abbreviation? and finally
* Whether you think the award should be created or not, just because
|