| rdfs:comment
| - Linden's Revised System of Classification, also known as the "Categoric-Gradial System of Classification", is another way of classifying the potential and importance of micronations. It was revised by its creator on December 27, 2011, to more accurately adapt to the changes in the view of "success" in micronational terms that had occurred since the original conception of the system. As its alternate name says, it works with Categories and Gradients, exactly five of each. A specialty of this classification is that it automatically classifies all micronations whose main claims are not on Earth as "0".
|
| abstract
| - Linden's Revised System of Classification, also known as the "Categoric-Gradial System of Classification", is another way of classifying the potential and importance of micronations. It was revised by its creator on December 27, 2011, to more accurately adapt to the changes in the view of "success" in micronational terms that had occurred since the original conception of the system. As its alternate name says, it works with Categories and Gradients, exactly five of each. A specialty of this classification is that it automatically classifies all micronations whose main claims are not on Earth as "0". The scale is fairly simple. The scale is from one to five, one being the worst class, and five being the best class. The categories, combined with the various scales are as follows:
* Politics
* 0: Completely inactive government.
* 1: Government is barely active, no more than a maximum of 3 laws passed per year.
* 2: Government is slightly active, no more than a maximum of 5 laws passed per year.
* 3: Government is somewhat active, a minimum of 5 laws passed per year.
* 4: Government is active, a minimum of 8 laws passed per year.
* 5: Government is very active, a minimum of 13 laws passed per year.
* Cultural development
* 0: No unique culture in existence.
* 1: Hardly any culture in existence. (eg. very scant information, often no flag)
* 2: Basic insignia in existence. (eg. flag, coat of arms, little detailed information)
* 3: Some culture in existence (eg. a cuisine or national dish)
* 4: A basic culture in existence (eg. a cuisine and a religion)
* 5: A strong culture in existence (many aspects covered, eg. cuisine, religion, language, sport etc.)
* Negative perception
* 0: Nation is criticised by everyone or almost everyone and has only or mostly negative relations.
* 1: Nation is criticised or has negative relations with more than 7 nations.
* 2: Nation '' '' '' '' '' '' '' more than 5 and up to and including 7 nations.
* 3: Nation '' '' '' '' '' '' '' more than 2 and '' '' '' '' 5 nations.
* 4: Nation '' '' '' '' '' '' '' up to and including 2 nations.
* 5: Nation is not criticised and has only positive relations.
* Budget
* 0: Apart from the head of government's internet connection, nothing is spent to further the nation.
* 1: Less than $50 USD spent yearly on the micronation in question. This includes its head of government's internet connection and web hosting costs.
* 2: Less than $100 USD '' '' '' '' '' '' ''. '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' ''.
* 3: Less than $150 USD '' '' '' '' '' '' ''. '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' ''.
* 4: Less than $200 USD '' '' '' '' '' '' ''. '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' ''.
* 5: More than $200 USD '' '' '' '' '' '' ''. This may or may not include its head of government's internet connection and web hosting costs.
* Development
* 0: Has nothing more than the bare necessities (an old computer with freeware software)
* 1: Has basic amenities like a fairly new computer with modern, commercial software.
* 2: Has slightly more advanced amenities like the above, a currency and optionally a website.
* 3: Has average amenities like the above, a few service-oriented businesses and optionally a forum.
* 4: Has good amenities like the above, a self-made building, monument or such and one or more production-oriented businesses.
* 5: Has excellent amenities like the above, some transport, a good, content-rich, well-designed website, and optionally primary industry.
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)