| rdfs:comment
| - I haven't yet applied this anywhere, but would like to suggest that we change the template call from {{Trades/X}} to {{Trades|mode=X}}. As it stands, does nothing, although viewers might be inclined to think it functions as a backbone for the other templates, which it does not. Further, users (or at least I) would think Trades/Buy meant that the player is buying -- but it means the NPC is. The new template helps eliminate any confusion and does in a way act as a backbone for the other templates. I have made all necessary changes except implementing it. I would like your opinions on this before the whole database is changed to accommodate for the system in place. -- Sixorish 19:45, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
| abstract
| - I haven't yet applied this anywhere, but would like to suggest that we change the template call from {{Trades/X}} to {{Trades|mode=X}}. As it stands, does nothing, although viewers might be inclined to think it functions as a backbone for the other templates, which it does not. Further, users (or at least I) would think Trades/Buy meant that the player is buying -- but it means the NPC is. The new template helps eliminate any confusion and does in a way act as a backbone for the other templates. I have made all necessary changes except implementing it. I would like your opinions on this before the whole database is changed to accommodate for the system in place. -- Sixorish 19:45, December 27, 2010 (UTC) Go ahead, we don't want anyone to be confused with the buy/sell thing. -- Bennie (talk ~ fellows) 20:10, December 27, 2010 (UTC) We should leave the buy and sell templates as they are as the template is from the perspective of the npc anyway. Plus currently the infobox says | = sells {{Trades/Sell= Surely it makes it easier for the user to put sell in the sell and buy in the buy? Craggles ಠ_ಠ Talk ∙ Contribs 21:19, December 27, 2010 (UTC) I considered that after I posted this, but then my arguments were in favor of changing it from buy -> buys as the third-person indicates we're not talking from the player's perspective (1st person), as the word buy does. What are your opinions on buy/buys then? -- Sixorish 21:37, December 27, 2010 (UTC) Good idea. Craggles ಠ_ಠ Talk ∙ Contribs 23:14, December 27, 2010 (UTC) I made some changes to the sell template, it now allows to show a different text for the item link and the target, everything seems to be backwards compatible. I will implement this for buy template when I have time. --Daniel Letalis 04:59, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
|