About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:PF4Eva/Mr. Nice Guy/archive2

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:PF4Eva/Mr. Nice Guy/archive2 Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I have just given the page a good shot or two of humor and now I think it's ready for the main space. Let me know what you think, thanks! 00:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the help! But I don't need any more pee. PF4Eva Thank you! I think I have everything fixed now. I'm gonna move it to the main space and see what everybody else thinks about the humor. 21:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:PF4Eva/Mr. Nice Guy/archive2
rdfs:comment	I have just given the page a good shot or two of humor and now I think it's ready for the main space. Let me know what you think, thanks! 00:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the help! But I don't need any more pee. PF4Eva Thank you! I think I have everything fixed now. I'm gonna move it to the main space and see what everybody else thinks about the humor. 21:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
dcterms:subject	Pee Review
Mcomment	averaged
Pcomment	Most of the prose seems consistently "professional," as one would expect to find in an encyclopedia or biography. Some of it doesn't, like "Least that's what you'd fucking think!" or "He got fired after forgetting to fart." Breaking out of a professional tone into something else can be funny, but you have to establish the tone, first. Anyway, though, the prose is pretty much adequate.
Icomment	Some of the images are the best part of this piece, I think. The "F-I-N G-E-R P-E-N-I-S" picture was particularly amusing. I liked the "Mr. *ice guy" photo, but it's not captioned ideally, I think - the idea that Niceguy held a job as Rice-O-Roni is perhaps a little too weird to be funny.
Pscore	7(xsd:integer)
Ccomment	1950.0
Cscore	3(xsd:integer)
Hcomment	50.0
Iscore	8(xsd:integer)
Hscore	5(xsd:integer)
Fcomment	Sorry, man, but I think this one needs to go all the way back to the drawing board. Or maybe to the drawing board for the first time, because that's the main problem with the article: it seems like you started writing it with very little plan for what it was going to be. I think the first thing you've got to ask yourself is "What is this a parody of?" Go from there.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/W88zu5x_9U19J4KDt9ZzoA== dbkwik:resource/9dNzZgDnN3eOgwYhBXU2bA== dbkwik:resource/yFN67gnsWPKFr390CT1mxA==
Signature	--05-03
abstract	I have just given the page a good shot or two of humor and now I think it's ready for the main space. Let me know what you think, thanks! 00:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the help! But I don't need any more pee. PF4Eva Thank you! I think I have everything fixed now. I'm gonna move it to the main space and see what everybody else thinks about the humor. 21:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software