About: Admin Tools Wiki talk:Requests for rights   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This user has twice created what appear to be draft Requests for rights, without transcluding them at Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights. They are Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights/Kjam and Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights/Kjam/2. In the second, the user claims to be a bureaucrat on Lufia Wiki, which is borne out by this logged adoption 05:27, September 21, 2010 (UTC). I am concerned about this user's continued passive-aggressive refusal to follow our established protocols, but I haven't wanted to comment on the drafts because it's usually poor form to do so on English Wikipedia. I have been more open about my concerns about User:Duhwayne because at least that one was officially transcluded. While we wait for their next moves, are there any suggestions other than waiting? Thanks!

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Admin Tools Wiki talk:Requests for rights
rdfs:comment
  • This user has twice created what appear to be draft Requests for rights, without transcluding them at Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights. They are Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights/Kjam and Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights/Kjam/2. In the second, the user claims to be a bureaucrat on Lufia Wiki, which is borne out by this logged adoption 05:27, September 21, 2010 (UTC). I am concerned about this user's continued passive-aggressive refusal to follow our established protocols, but I haven't wanted to comment on the drafts because it's usually poor form to do so on English Wikipedia. I have been more open about my concerns about User:Duhwayne because at least that one was officially transcluded. While we wait for their next moves, are there any suggestions other than waiting? Thanks!
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:admintools/...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • This user has twice created what appear to be draft Requests for rights, without transcluding them at Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights. They are Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights/Kjam and Admin Tools Wiki:Requests for rights/Kjam/2. In the second, the user claims to be a bureaucrat on Lufia Wiki, which is borne out by this logged adoption 05:27, September 21, 2010 (UTC). I am concerned about this user's continued passive-aggressive refusal to follow our established protocols, but I haven't wanted to comment on the drafts because it's usually poor form to do so on English Wikipedia. I have been more open about my concerns about User:Duhwayne because at least that one was officially transcluded. While we wait for their next moves, are there any suggestions other than waiting? Thanks! — Jeff G. ツ 02:02, September 27, 2010 (UTC) I don't know if this is a place for me to comment but, I might reccomend asking for a Check User to confirm that he is really the bureaucrat on the wiki he says he is. I would specifically ask him why he deos not follow policy and why he thinks by not following policy he will get admin rights. Joe_Gazz84 User:Joe_Gazz84 19:54, September 27, 2010 (UTC) That is not necessary - Wikia has a mandatory single login for all wikis (there are no local or unattached accounts like on WMF wikis). On the other hand, Wikia's standards for adopting wikis are pretty low. — Jeff G. ツ 01:42, September 28, 2010 (UTC) Ok, I didn't know that. Well, then my opinion is to wait. Joe_Gazz84 User:Joe_Gazz84 11:03, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software