rdfs:comment
| - Is it ok to redirect to a specific section of a page, as Aba does now?--The Erl of the Forum:SH Archive/Redirects talk What I do 00:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
* I don't see why not, but, what do I know? And you're an affable sort. I really wanted to get shouted at. I mean, I see arguments for and against it, but in the case of a merge-to style absorbtion, I think it makes sense--The Erl of the Forum:SH Archive/Redirects talk What I do 00:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
* It's done on Wikipedia and other wikis all the time, so I don't see why not. —Silly Dan (talk) 00:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
|
abstract
| - Is it ok to redirect to a specific section of a page, as Aba does now?--The Erl of the Forum:SH Archive/Redirects talk What I do 00:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
* I don't see why not, but, what do I know? And you're an affable sort. I really wanted to get shouted at. I mean, I see arguments for and against it, but in the case of a merge-to style absorbtion, I think it makes sense--The Erl of the Forum:SH Archive/Redirects talk What I do 00:28, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
* It's done on Wikipedia and other wikis all the time, so I don't see why not. —Silly Dan (talk) 00:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC) It's not technically possible to redirect to page sections. Although the syntax allows it, the links themselves do not work (go ahead, try Aba). RMF 04:31, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
*
* Yeah, I saw that before, but when you go to the redirect page like this, and click through manually, you end up at the appropriate section: that's why I was confused--The Erl of the Forum:SH Archive/Redirects talk What I do 13:30, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
|