About: Wookieepedia:Inq/Battle of Coruscant (Clone Wars)   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

The article was due to be featured on 12 August as part of our Clone Wars FAathon. Since it's on probation, I've pushed it back to the 17th. However, no article on probation can actually be on the main page, so we need to either end the probation period and keep it as an FA or push it further back in the queue until after the next Inq meeting as we would normally do. It's such an instantly recognizable Clone Wars article that I think this would be a shame. The problems with it are outlined above. Chack has done a lot of work on it and believes they are all fixed. If you vote to push it back on the queue, suggestions on a suitable replacement would be helpful. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Wookieepedia:Inq/Battle of Coruscant (Clone Wars)
rdfs:comment
  • The article was due to be featured on 12 August as part of our Clone Wars FAathon. Since it's on probation, I've pushed it back to the 17th. However, no article on probation can actually be on the main page, so we need to either end the probation period and keep it as an FA or push it further back in the queue until after the next Inq meeting as we would normally do. It's such an instantly recognizable Clone Wars article that I think this would be a shame. The problems with it are outlined above. Chack has done a lot of work on it and believes they are all fixed. If you vote to push it back on the queue, suggestions on a suitable replacement would be helpful. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • The article was due to be featured on 12 August as part of our Clone Wars FAathon. Since it's on probation, I've pushed it back to the 17th. However, no article on probation can actually be on the main page, so we need to either end the probation period and keep it as an FA or push it further back in the queue until after the next Inq meeting as we would normally do. It's such an instantly recognizable Clone Wars article that I think this would be a shame. The problems with it are outlined above. Chack has done a lot of work on it and believes they are all fixed. If you vote to push it back on the queue, suggestions on a suitable replacement would be helpful. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 1. * Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 2. * Imperialles 22:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 3. * Chack Jadson (Talk) 22:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 4. * Lord Hydronium 22:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC) 5. * Provided that BtS gets fixed, I'm fine with it. Atarumaster88 File:Jedi Order.svg (Talk page) 14:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 6. * Jaina Solo(Talk) 21:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 7. * Darth Culator (Talk) 01:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 1. * -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 22:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software