About: Articles for deletion/Inline-twin engine   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This article is a POV fork created in the midst of a move discussion at Talk:Straight-two engine. Bridge Boy (talkcontribs) was unable to win consensus to move Straight-two engine, and was unable to win consensus for the idea that the terms straight-two engine, inline-twin engine and parallel-twin engine are not synonyms. This page was created in spite of clear opposition from multiple editors, with no editors supporting a new page. Inline-twin engine exists on the basis of cherry-picking sources which support the belief that the term is a distinct engine type, and stubbornly ignoring all the sources that treat the terms as interchangeable. Straight-two engine is less than 1,000 words in length, and Inline-twin engine is barely over 500 words, not even counting duplication. Wikipedia:Summa

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Articles for deletion/Inline-twin engine
rdfs:comment
  • This article is a POV fork created in the midst of a move discussion at Talk:Straight-two engine. Bridge Boy (talkcontribs) was unable to win consensus to move Straight-two engine, and was unable to win consensus for the idea that the terms straight-two engine, inline-twin engine and parallel-twin engine are not synonyms. This page was created in spite of clear opposition from multiple editors, with no editors supporting a new page. Inline-twin engine exists on the basis of cherry-picking sources which support the belief that the term is a distinct engine type, and stubbornly ignoring all the sources that treat the terms as interchangeable. Straight-two engine is less than 1,000 words in length, and Inline-twin engine is barely over 500 words, not even counting duplication. Wikipedia:Summa
dbkwik:speedydelet...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • This article is a POV fork created in the midst of a move discussion at Talk:Straight-two engine. Bridge Boy (talkcontribs) was unable to win consensus to move Straight-two engine, and was unable to win consensus for the idea that the terms straight-two engine, inline-twin engine and parallel-twin engine are not synonyms. This page was created in spite of clear opposition from multiple editors, with no editors supporting a new page. Inline-twin engine exists on the basis of cherry-picking sources which support the belief that the term is a distinct engine type, and stubbornly ignoring all the sources that treat the terms as interchangeable. Straight-two engine is less than 1,000 words in length, and Inline-twin engine is barely over 500 words, not even counting duplication. Wikipedia:Summary style doesn't recommend spawning child articles until length is in the 6,000 to 10,000 word range. Dennis Bratland (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:19, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software