Does this template have the StaffCorr module? Doesn't look like it. --Tupka217 11:25, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Since it was reverted to the non-portable template, it probably uses instead. - Hatebunny (talk) 12:46, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Normally, a null edit would fix it. But it doesn't. --Tupka217 12:51, May 4, 2017 (UTC) it worked for me! - Hatebunny (talk) 14:55, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Weird. Ah well. --Tupka217 14:58, May 4, 2017 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - DC Database talk:Collected Template
|
rdfs:comment
| - Does this template have the StaffCorr module? Doesn't look like it. --Tupka217 11:25, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Since it was reverted to the non-portable template, it probably uses instead. - Hatebunny (talk) 12:46, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Normally, a null edit would fix it. But it doesn't. --Tupka217 12:51, May 4, 2017 (UTC) it worked for me! - Hatebunny (talk) 14:55, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Weird. Ah well. --Tupka217 14:58, May 4, 2017 (UTC)
|
dbkwik:dc/property/wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
abstract
| - Does this template have the StaffCorr module? Doesn't look like it. --Tupka217 11:25, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Since it was reverted to the non-portable template, it probably uses instead. - Hatebunny (talk) 12:46, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Normally, a null edit would fix it. But it doesn't. --Tupka217 12:51, May 4, 2017 (UTC) it worked for me! - Hatebunny (talk) 14:55, May 4, 2017 (UTC) Weird. Ah well. --Tupka217 14:58, May 4, 2017 (UTC)
|