Flavius II (20 November 70 AD- 14 August 114 AD ) was the seventh member of the Argead-Ptolemaic dynasty of Diadochia. He was the son of Flavius I, and succeeded his father in 99, and ruled until his death. Flavius reigned as Emperor for fifteen years and during this time he strengthened the economy, reinforced the country's fortifications, and initiated a massive building program to revitalize the city of Pella.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:label
| - Titus Flavius II Augustus
|
rdfs:comment
| - Flavius II (20 November 70 AD- 14 August 114 AD ) was the seventh member of the Argead-Ptolemaic dynasty of Diadochia. He was the son of Flavius I, and succeeded his father in 99, and ruled until his death. Flavius reigned as Emperor for fifteen years and during this time he strengthened the economy, reinforced the country's fortifications, and initiated a massive building program to revitalize the city of Pella.
|
house type
| |
dbkwik:nation-stat...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
dbkwik:nationstate...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
Birth Date
| |
Spouse
| |
Name
| |
Type
| |
Issue
| |
Father
| |
Mother
| |
Title
| |
death date
| |
House
| |
Successor
| |
Religion
| |
Reign
| |
Succession
| |
Predecessor
| |
abstract
| - Flavius II (20 November 70 AD- 14 August 114 AD ) was the seventh member of the Argead-Ptolemaic dynasty of Diadochia. He was the son of Flavius I, and succeeded his father in 99, and ruled until his death. Flavius reigned as Emperor for fifteen years and during this time he strengthened the economy, reinforced the country's fortifications, and initiated a massive building program to revitalize the city of Pella. Flavius saw himself as a new Ptolemy Augustus and governed the empire autocratically as enlightened despot and paved the way for religious, military, and cultural propaganda that fostered a cult of personality. Flavius even sought to uphold and enforce both public and private morals; this made him popular among the common people and the army, but caused him to be labeled a tyrant by the elite. While many members of the aristocracy considered him to be a cruel and paranoid tyrant; many historians claim that despite his ruthlessness, he was efficient and that this efficiency provided the foundations for the glorious 2nd century.
|
is Issue
of | |
is Successor
of | |
is Predecessor
of | |