About: Wookieepedia:Inq/Old FA reassessment   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

As has been pointed out, we are getting way too stagnant. Meaning, we need to start doing something, starting right now. So on Saturday, at an as yet undetermined time (most likely later, or we can just do it at a Mofference time like 5) we're going to convene in the #wookieepedia-inquisitorius channel (if you don't have an IRC client go get one) and start to weed through the past FAs to make sure that they're up to snuff. We're going to go through all the FAs from 2005 just so we can get a good jump start on things. After that, we can maybe go 8 per week or some other decided on number.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Wookieepedia:Inq/Old FA reassessment
rdfs:comment
  • As has been pointed out, we are getting way too stagnant. Meaning, we need to start doing something, starting right now. So on Saturday, at an as yet undetermined time (most likely later, or we can just do it at a Mofference time like 5) we're going to convene in the #wookieepedia-inquisitorius channel (if you don't have an IRC client go get one) and start to weed through the past FAs to make sure that they're up to snuff. We're going to go through all the FAs from 2005 just so we can get a good jump start on things. After that, we can maybe go 8 per week or some other decided on number.
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:starwars/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • As has been pointed out, we are getting way too stagnant. Meaning, we need to start doing something, starting right now. So on Saturday, at an as yet undetermined time (most likely later, or we can just do it at a Mofference time like 5) we're going to convene in the #wookieepedia-inquisitorius channel (if you don't have an IRC client go get one) and start to weed through the past FAs to make sure that they're up to snuff. We're going to go through all the FAs from 2005 just so we can get a good jump start on things. After that, we can maybe go 8 per week or some other decided on number. As has been discussed a little bit, if we find that the article is, for lack of a better word, "crap", then we'll put a notice up on the article's talk page (preferably a less insulting one then the one whipped up by 4dot) telling them to get it up to FA status or it gets the "gray star". So we're going to need at least 7 inquisitors to come. If we can't get that many, then we're going to have to postpone, so get the word out. Oh yeah, you might want to skim these articles, so you actually have a little bit of a handle on the situation.
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software