About: FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Category talk:Aht Urhgan NPCs   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This and seem useless. I say either have Whitegate NPCs moved to or just have this. But "Aht Urhgan" would also refer to its eastern capital, which is supposedly being released in the Far Eastern expansion (if there is ever to be one) and that would probably clutter this category, but it would just be a subcategory so what am I saying. Also, if is under here, I would say it's worth arguing that belongs under and belongs under since they are both under control by those respective nations. --Joped 18:20, 23 February 2007 (EST) --Gahoo 17:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • FFXIclopedia:AfD Discussions/Category talk:Aht Urhgan NPCs
rdfs:comment
  • This and seem useless. I say either have Whitegate NPCs moved to or just have this. But "Aht Urhgan" would also refer to its eastern capital, which is supposedly being released in the Far Eastern expansion (if there is ever to be one) and that would probably clutter this category, but it would just be a subcategory so what am I saying. Also, if is under here, I would say it's worth arguing that belongs under and belongs under since they are both under control by those respective nations. --Joped 18:20, 23 February 2007 (EST) --Gahoo 17:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:ffxiclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • This and seem useless. I say either have Whitegate NPCs moved to or just have this. But "Aht Urhgan" would also refer to its eastern capital, which is supposedly being released in the Far Eastern expansion (if there is ever to be one) and that would probably clutter this category, but it would just be a subcategory so what am I saying. Also, if is under here, I would say it's worth arguing that belongs under and belongs under since they are both under control by those respective nations. --Joped 18:20, 23 February 2007 (EST) Delete I agree with the above. According to The Empire of Aht Urhgan (much of which came from SE), Al Zahbi is the name of the city. So NPCs in the zones of Al Zahbi and Whitegate belong in . This and should be deleted. should be separate. --Gahoo 17:18, 12 March 2007 (EDT) If I changed all of the articles under this category to reflect that there are just Al Zahbi NPCs and Nashmau NPCs, it will be easier to delete this and ? --Joped 18:13, 25 March 2007 (EDT) There's a lot of articles under this category. Why did someone even bother to make this category only to put the articles in the subcategories in it anyway? ; ; Anyway, I might not be able to get this category ready for deletion today, especially since there's so much. Maybe someone else can help? Like someone takes Whitegate (need to replace both Category:Aht Urhgan Whitegate NPCs and Category:Aht Urhgan NPcs with here), someone takes Zahbi (just get rid of Category:Aht Urhgan NPCs here), and someone takes Nashmau (same as Zahbi). --Joped 17:54, 17 April 2007 (EDT)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software