| abstract
| - I've listed this article for peer review because I am going to eventualy nominate it for FA or FL. I'd like any general advice you have to offer, and specific advice on the following: 1.
* Would this make a better FA or FL candidate? 2.
* Should the filmography be split out into its own list? 3.
* Many of the film entries are redlinks, and may never have articles due to lack of coverage. What do you think about adding a film summary in the Notes column? It may be too small--perhaps add a second dedicated row like you see with episode lists? Skip the summary? 4.
* Should I make the video thumbs smaller? Finally I know the sources need work--date, publisher, etc.--so you can dispense with formatting comments on sources. Thanks, – Lionel (talk) 23:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
* Wouldn't look entirely out of place at FLC but there's a heap of prose so it could be FAC too. So that's not very helpful is it?!
* I don't think the filmography should be split off, you'd end up repeating a lot of the main prose in a standalone list, I think it makes a good comprehensive article as is.
* Summaries are good if you can add them.
* Video thumb sizes are fine for me, they're not forced beyond the normal thumb size and I think that's best.
* 6 dab links, Distinguished Flying Cross, Craig Stevens, Frank Thomas, Robert Morgan, Paramount and Arthur Kennedy.
* File:Yes check.svg Done– Lionel (talk) 03:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
* Check the actors link to the pages you'd expect, e.g. by Vince Evans, you probably don't mean a footballer born 11 years after he appeared in this film.
* File:Yes check.svg Done– Lionel (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
* It's not written in any MOS that I've ever found, but I would expect to see references in numerical order.
* "1,110 men[2]" all men?
* According to this source. Moreover, I don't recall any of the sources mentioning that women served in the unit.– Lionel (talk) 03:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
* "and The Last Bomb–all of which " not keen on the style of that unspaced en-dash in this sentence.
* Note, for most if not all modern FACs, there's usually no requirement to provide any refs in the lead because anything there should be expanded upon (and referenced) in the main body of the article.
* How did you select the "selected" Warner Bros. films?
* I added every film I could reliably attribute to FMPU.– Lionel (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
* No need for notes column to be sortable.
* File:Yes check.svg Done– Lionel (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
* Participants, if you wish the col to be sortable, ought to sort by surname.
* Not keen at all on a category in the see also links. At least pipelink it so it doesn't display across a cross-wikispace link.
* File:Yes check.svg Done – Lionel (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
* Avoid double hyphens in the prose, stick with spaced en-dashes for instance.
* Think I gotr all of them. – Lionel (talk) 03:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC) Hopefully a start for you. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:00, 1 July 2012 (UTC) Quick Comment I think this should eventually be two articles - one on the unit itself (potential FA) and one as a filmography (potential FL). If you want an example of a fairly listy FA, see Waterfalls in Ricketts Glen State Park, but I see this as more like an article on a famous director or actor/actress, and then a filmography (list) of that person's films. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 12:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)