Well, I have not written anything new for a while now, so maybe I need a bit of a kicking on this one... What do ya think? Any ideas or suggestions obviously appreciated, and by all means, just go ahead and edit the hell out of it if you think that's the thing to do. Thanks. 03:54, Mar 22
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Battle of the Sexes
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Well, I have not written anything new for a while now, so maybe I need a bit of a kicking on this one... What do ya think? Any ideas or suggestions obviously appreciated, and by all means, just go ahead and edit the hell out of it if you think that's the thing to do. Thanks. 03:54, Mar 22
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| - Averaged and rounded up. I hate decimals.
|
| Pcomment
| - Mostly very nice. The layout is pleasing for the most part although there's a large gap between the introductory paragraph and the first section which is, well, a little ugly not to put too fine a point on it. There were a few typos and whatnot, but I think they're all gone now.
|
| Icomment
| - Even though there was only the one picture of the three lesbians, it totally made the article. What? There were other pictures as well? I hadn't noticed! Seriously, the images are great. I found the pic of Emily Davidson to be especially amusing . The last two images are the weakest, but even so they don't detract from the quality of the article.
|
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - Great concept and great execution of the concept. Really nothing much else to say.
|
| Cscore
| |
| Mscore
| |
| Hcomment
| - While there weren't any spit-take inducing moments, I felt it had a very enjoyable feel throughout. The main two criteria I use to judge humor are: Is it funny? and Is it consistant? While this isn't the funniest thing I've read here, it is well worth the space it'll take up on the server. More importantly in some ways, it is also constistant. I was enjoying it just as much at the end as I was at the beginning.
|
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - I enjoyed it. Maybe give it just a bit more polishing, but I think it's ready to go as is.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Signature
| |
| abstract
| - Well, I have not written anything new for a while now, so maybe I need a bit of a kicking on this one... What do ya think? Any ideas or suggestions obviously appreciated, and by all means, just go ahead and edit the hell out of it if you think that's the thing to do. Thanks. 03:54, Mar 22 Thanks Optimuschris, I can't help thinking you have been a little generous there, especially with the images and concept scores, but I know you are right on the humour front. It's more kinda "nice" to read rather than funny, I will see what I can do about that... Oh, this is on the talk page of the article, so I guess it's best to discuss stuff further over there if you wish to. Thanks again! 20:39, Mar 22
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)