At the end of August 2009, two researchers, Oli Ogas and Sai Gaddam, posted a survey of Fan fiction writers and publicised it widely on LiveJournal. The survey contained many problematic questions and led to extensive discussion by the fannish community, and eventually complete repudiation and mockery of the researchers, their goals, and methods. The survey and its aftermath raised issues of Essentialism, Social expectations, Condescension and more.
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| |
rdfs:comment
| - At the end of August 2009, two researchers, Oli Ogas and Sai Gaddam, posted a survey of Fan fiction writers and publicised it widely on LiveJournal. The survey contained many problematic questions and led to extensive discussion by the fannish community, and eventually complete repudiation and mockery of the researchers, their goals, and methods. The survey and its aftermath raised issues of Essentialism, Social expectations, Condescension and more.
|
dcterms:subject
| |
abstract
| - At the end of August 2009, two researchers, Oli Ogas and Sai Gaddam, posted a survey of Fan fiction writers and publicised it widely on LiveJournal. The survey contained many problematic questions and led to extensive discussion by the fannish community, and eventually complete repudiation and mockery of the researchers, their goals, and methods. The survey and its aftermath raised issues of Essentialism, Social expectations, Condescension and more.
|