| abstract
| - Obiviously, each is a huge face with hands. Both are hurt the same way for the first step: Link must shoot an arrow into the air at both hands. The head is next to be attacked by Link for both bosses. By the way, I thought of this one without any “help,” if you know what I mean (meaning that I thought of this without looking at the pages). If this makes it, then we get The Minish Cap in the Temple of Courage. TheFile:Midna Laughing.png™ 21:52, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: Done before, and I'm not interested in seeing whether or not the result is different this time around. --AuronKaizer! 21:58, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Which archive? (sorry...) TheFile:Midna Laughing.png™ 21:59, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Archivo Trés. --AuronKaizer! 22:02, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Okay. I personally think that it was long enough ago to go again (not to mention that there are mostly different users now), but okay. TheFile:Midna Laughing.png™ 22:05, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Of course you could go again. You misunderstand my point. --AuronKaizer! 22:12, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: I probably would have supported if it hadn't been done before, but it has. -Isdrakthül 22:01, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral: Ehh... --EveryDayJoe45 (talk) 22:05, June 20, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: I hate repeat fights. Sorry. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 00:27, June 21, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting support.svg Support: I thinks this is awesome. Would be a good boss fight. Im surprised at all the opposes. Meep Meep (talk) 00:31, June 21, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting support.svg Support: I like it. --DekuStick Master File:Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral: Kinda like it, but it is also a repeat fight so I kinda don't. Neutral it is then.-- C2 / CC 01:49, June 21, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting neutral.svg Neutral: I just don't know what to say about it, consarnit.--RedeadhunterFile:Redead.pngContributions Edits 01:51, June 21, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: If it's a reapeat, then no.--Hylianhero777 (talk) 22:16, June 21, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting oppose.svg Oppose: Yah, no repeats --Michael RyanTalk 19:16, June 22, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: This is to all of you who are opposing just because it is a repeat: it was done very long ago. Long before most of us were even here. If you want to oppose, do so for a good reason. Opposing just because it is a repeat doesn't make much sense to me unless if you were here for the first. You may do as you please, but I've said what I had to say. TheFile:Midna Laughing.png™ 20:57, June 22, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: Well, I was here for the first, but that's not why I dislike it for being a repeat fight. Essentially, repeat fights are, for me, just pointless. I mean, the rules state that you can resuggest fights that have been done, but to me it's just a huge redundancy. It's been done before and could, hypothetically, continue to be done next year and the year after that and the year after that. Sure, outcome may be different and people who weren't there for the first go around can vote on it, but as a result of being a repeat fight, all the freshness of the fight is completely drained (and not just because I was around the first time, I'm speaking from a conceptual standpoint) and, although not completely certain due to newer users, we can already more or less predict the outcome. Xykeb Yvolix Zraliv 01:05, June 23, 2010 (UTC) File:Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: I guess I see what you mean, but it still feels fresh for me (and I imagine for other users, also). The main users to whom I am referring are the two above my comment. TheFile:Midna Laughing.png™ 01:12, June 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)