| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive-2014-11
|
| Keep
| - --10-19
- --10-29
- --11-01
- --11-09
- --11-14
- --11-16
- --11-23
- --10-22
- --11-07
- # I've thoroughly re-worked this. No offense to our Welshish friend Llwy-ar-lawr: I was on a roll and didn't look at your edit until I'd finished mine. My most common-denominator contribution yet, but a significant improvement if i may say so myself. TheCan
# . It's fixed. SPIKE/signature(00:03 13-Nov-14)
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Comments
| - --10-30
- --11-02
- --11-09
- --11-16
- 86400.0
- --10-22
- --11-04
- --11-18
- --10-20
- *Detailed editing comments moved to replacement article's talk page. SPIKE/signature(17:04 19-Oct-14)
*Not sure if this is the right place to say this, but I've tried to follow your suggestions, Spike, and would appreciate it if you could have another look. Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141023200806
*Replaced. SPIKE/signature(12:03 5-Nov-14)
- *Having just written Malala Yousafzai , it might be good if this page became a sort of Disambiguation Page to our articles on actual award-winners. Failing that, it should be deleted as it is a huge list whose entries are name + wisecrack. SPIKE/signature(14:55 29-Oct-14)
- *I'm not sure what's supposed to happen here, but you might be interested in this slightly more sanitary version. Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141014173645
*:It is much cleaner, but it is also from 2007, and presumably omits comedy based on news in the last seven years — I assume there is some. Is there a Brit in the house who would like to do a merge? SPIKE/signature(18:11 14-Oct-14)
- *'Numb lists'? Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141118014318
*:Numb, without feeling, without a sense of what anything is doing there. SPIKE/signature(01:53 18-Nov-14)
- *Concurrence to replace the article with another article would not be Keep but Delete. SPIKE/signature(23:55 12-Nov-14)
*Deleted. The Who: My Re-Generation moved on top of it; old name will still work. SPIKE/signature(02:42 13-Nov-14)
- *Despite my warning, Llwy-ar-lawr has been trying to streamline this. But what you wind up with is an "ism" whose only humor is its impossibility — that is, the fact that it is a page no one will look up — unless you came here from Facebook etc. to see if there is an article on this offsite meme. SPIKE/signature(17:35 14-Nov-14)
- *It hardly discusses babies anyway. Only two paragraphs at the end. Llwy-ar-lawr/sig|20141123013038
|
| delnumber
| - 0(xsd:integer)
- 1(xsd:integer)
- 2(xsd:integer)
- 3(xsd:integer)
- 4(xsd:integer)
- 5(xsd:integer)
|
| keepnumber
| - 0(xsd:integer)
- 1(xsd:integer)
- 2(xsd:integer)
- 3(xsd:integer)
|
| delete
| - --10-19
- --10-25
- --10-26
- --10-29
- --10-30
- --11-05
- --11-06
- --11-13
- --11-16
- --11-17
- --11-20
- --11-21
- --11-23
- # It has it all: A tedious read without photos, hard to tell whether author is an ideologue or is ridiculing ideologues, had links to Facebook and YouTube apparently to hump an internet meme , and is full of encyclopedia cliches.
- # with the featured version. As the article is mostly about the band, and the song is only a small digression, it shouldn't require any editing. SPIKE/signature(00:11 9-Nov-14)
- * Literally over 100 meaningless "varieties," short enough to convince every drive-by editor that he can add one. Proves that articles espousing the belief that "deliberately bad is funny" invite the belief that "more is better." SPIKE/signature(11:56, 23:04 9-Nov-14) Rescinded. Improved by ConCass2 and by me. SPIKE/signature(00:56 10-Nov-14)
|
| Time
| - --10-12
- --10-19
- --10-26
- --10-28
- --10-29
- --10-30
- --11-03
- --11-06
- --11-09
- --11-12
- --11-13
- --11-16
- --11-17
- --11-20
- --11-21
- --11-23
- --10-14
- --10-22
- --10-20
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)