About: Stormwaltz 2016 Q&A/Question 34   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Stormwaltz 2016 Q&A/Question 34
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:asheron/pro...iPageUsesTemplate
Date
  • September, 2016
Text
  • You'd have to ask a member of the AC2 team to know for sure. I can only offer my post-fact interpretation.
  • As with the greater story goals, creation of creatures in AC2 often came down to, "That's the most interesting-looking concept we have. Make up a story for it." Which is great! That's how all the monsters from AC1 were designed. You can get great results when you let artists explore on their own. I remember in particular the wonderfully bizarre creations of Sonny Liew, who's since made a career in comics. I was fascinated by his revolting mucor.
  • An infinite amount of weirdness could be swept under the rug of the Fifth Sending between the two AC games. The spawn was a design that looked good, and might have got in on that alone. Are they Slithis? Sure, why not? They look about right. Say they're very young ones , mutated by exposure to the reality-warping powers of the Nameless, like everything else not locked in the shelters by Asheron.
Link
  • No
Question
  • What were the Spawn, and how did they relate to the Old Ones/Slithis of AC1?
Developer
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software