About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Moving the goal posts   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

It's "good enough". You could obviously do more though. Seriously, take a look at the guidelines, there's a shitload of ideas there! (Dec 11 / 15:28)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Moving the goal posts
rdfs:comment
  • It's "good enough". You could obviously do more though. Seriously, take a look at the guidelines, there's a shitload of ideas there! (Dec 11 / 15:28)
dcterms:subject
Mcomment
  • Avg'd. Just a little extra comment: aren't there a bit too many inappropriate categories? That threw me off a little, made me go through and re-read in case I'd missed anything when I hadn't...
Pcomment
  • Quite eloquent at points, which is refreshing and welcome. The formatting is a li'l off-putting from "Attempting to prevent post movement" onwards though. I think you should perhaps elaborate more on that aforementioned section to justify the size of the headline, or make it a smaller headline and merge it into the lower sections.
Icomment
  • The OSI thing is funny, but the lower pictures don't seem to do much more than make the formatting look a little prettier. They don't contribute any funny to the article. I'm not sure if it's possible to get a humorous picture of someone doing something relevant to "Moving the goal posts," but could yew try? You can find absolutely anything on google image search so I'm sure there could be something somewhere.
Pscore
  • 7(xsd:double)
Ccomment
  • Pretty cool idea... an original idea for a "sport", and the political / business side still allows readers to laugh as it's not too complex for someone not into that kind of thing.
Cscore
  • 8(xsd:integer)
Hcomment
  • Started great with an original oscar wilde quote... and kept on going from there. Some great "lol"s. A li'l problem however is following the article. It's quite intimidating reading "important" and "unimportant" so many times and I found my eyes trailing off, almost being bounced off by the sheer magnitude of those two words within the article. The "editing note" feels unnecessary and it doesn't really add any humour.
Iscore
  • 7(xsd:integer)
Hscore
  • 7(xsd:integer)
Fcomment
  • Put basically, it's a pretty great article. Little tweaks here and there would definitely make it even better.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
Signature
  • Fag/sig
abstract
  • It's "good enough". You could obviously do more though. Seriously, take a look at the guidelines, there's a shitload of ideas there! (Dec 11 / 15:28)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software