About: LOTR:Articles for deletion/Archive 3

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: LOTR:Articles for deletion/Archive 3 Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Delete: Is this really something to do with strategy games or just fandom? If so I vote delete.--DarkLantern 12:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Cleanup maybe Delete: This is a real think and not just fandom. It looks to be part of the Khadzad-dúm expansion for Games Workshop's The Lord of the Rings Strategy Battle Game. A picture of the unit can be found here under the heading Good Warriors. Now the debate is do we want to keep it. I personal feel that we should clean it up and keep it, but I'm not going to fight to hard on that front if other feel that it should be removed. - Razor77 22:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	LOTR:Articles for deletion/Archive 3
rdfs:comment	Delete: Is this really something to do with strategy games or just fandom? If so I vote delete.--DarkLantern 12:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Cleanup maybe Delete: This is a real think and not just fandom. It looks to be part of the Khadzad-dúm expansion for Games Workshop's The Lord of the Rings Strategy Battle Game. A picture of the unit can be found here under the heading Good Warriors. Now the debate is do we want to keep it. I personal feel that we should clean it up and keep it, but I'm not going to fight to hard on that front if other feel that it should be removed. - Razor77 22:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
dbkwik:lotr/proper...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/TzQIp98XTtLTFMJRWWsEMA==
abstract	Delete: Is this really something to do with strategy games or just fandom? If so I vote delete.--DarkLantern 12:55, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Cleanup maybe Delete: This is a real think and not just fandom. It looks to be part of the Khadzad-dúm expansion for Games Workshop's The Lord of the Rings Strategy Battle Game. A picture of the unit can be found here under the heading Good Warriors. Now the debate is do we want to keep it. I personal feel that we should clean it up and keep it, but I'm not going to fight to hard on that front if other feel that it should be removed. - Razor77 22:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Delete: If this is real it must have come from a video game, but I don't think it's really necessary or worth having. 14:22, 26 July 2009 (UTC) Delete --Nickthegeek 22:33, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Strong Merge: Perhaps merging this page with the main article may prove an acceptable compromise? Deleting it entirely may yet be somewhat unnecessary. Ralnon (talk) 14:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Comment: It is indeed from the strategy battle game, but not mentioned as canon. Not sure what you want to do in this circumstances. Toon Ganondorf (t c) 13:08, October 3, 2009 (UTC) Cleanup It is from the Strategy Battle Game. It should probably be cleaned up, but if you want to delete it thats fine by me. -- User:Uldor Kept Since this is indeed something from the Strategy Battle Game, it has a right to be hear but it should be cleaned up a bit so I left a message of that there.--DarkLantern 22:56, October 27, 2009 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software