About: Avatar Wiki:War Room/Future Industries category

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Avatar Wiki:War Room/Future Industries category Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

__NOWYSIWYG__ Taking into account the people, locations, and objects associated with Future Industries; I would say we have enough articles to create a category for the organization. What do you guys think? BenignSpirit 23:33, November 11, 2017 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Avatar Wiki:War Room/Future Industries category
rdfs:comment	__NOWYSIWYG__ Taking into account the people, locations, and objects associated with Future Industries; I would say we have enough articles to create a category for the organization. What do you guys think? BenignSpirit 23:33, November 11, 2017 (UTC)
dbkwik:avatar/prop...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/GAKiAE0oHlIknFYdTGY0_Q== dbkwik:resource/K13CHN0f3-Y92MtFUcbkAQ== dbkwik:resource/vh5CELhUKYhchE01MHyOMw==
abstract	__NOWYSIWYG__ Taking into account the people, locations, and objects associated with Future Industries; I would say we have enough articles to create a category for the organization. What do you guys think? BenignSpirit 23:33, November 11, 2017 (UTC) Hmm, to be honest, I don’t really see the added informational and navigational value of such a category. 08:35, November 12, 2017 (UTC) Well, seeing as we already have categories for other organizations, why not? Just as a general note, the reason why new categories need community consensus is to try to only have relevant and useful categories on our pages, and we don't really operate according to a "because we can" and "we have A, so why not B"-type of reasoning. 19:47, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software