rdfs:comment
| - I'm not sure if I'm supposed to do this or not; but I think this should be said. This isn't a competion, Icestorm and Nightshine are not competing against eachother. When you comment on either one, it shouldn't be - "Icestorm would be better than Nightshine," or, "Nightshine would be better than Icestorm." That could hurt someone's feelings :( I think what Frostheart said above is nicely put :) Night Fall 23:24, June 22, 2010 (UTC) I agree. One user said something about Nightshine doing a better job, it hurt my feelings. Icefall Icy Winds 23:45, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
|
abstract
| - I'm not sure if I'm supposed to do this or not; but I think this should be said. This isn't a competion, Icestorm and Nightshine are not competing against eachother. When you comment on either one, it shouldn't be - "Icestorm would be better than Nightshine," or, "Nightshine would be better than Icestorm." That could hurt someone's feelings :( I think what Frostheart said above is nicely put :) Night Fall 23:24, June 22, 2010 (UTC) I agree. One user said something about Nightshine doing a better job, it hurt my feelings. Icefall Icy Winds 23:45, June 22, 2010 (UTC) This is correct. This was definitely never meant to be a competition. Icestorm, even though you didn't receive the position this time around, keep in mind that you could always be nominated again. You were very close to having a successful nomination, and if there is a second time, you have a good chance. In the meantime, let's not take away from Nightshine's nomination just because there was a misunderstanding. --Bramble 02:04, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
|