To anyone who is remotely bothered. Would it be suitable for existing articles that are linked to from many sources not to be moved to the UnBooks namespace, rather simply placed in ? This would save a lot of hassle fixing redlinks afterwards, and would also help the project take into account previously created articles. These might help get it off the ground in terms of material and content. Just a thought, like. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Converse 13:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC) UnBooks isn't a real namespace (though it should be). 19:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate | |
abstract |
|