About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Nuke the whales(resub.)

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Nuke the whales(resub.) Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I've been working on this one a bit, and I was wondering how it looks? Good, bad, funny, lame? Your opinions and suggestions for improvement are greatly appreciated.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Nuke the whales(resub.)
rdfs:comment	I've been working on this one a bit, and I was wondering how it looks? Good, bad, funny, lame? Your opinions and suggestions for improvement are greatly appreciated.
dcterms:subject	Reviewed
Mcomment	lots of little laughs. love the Jesus part.
Pcomment	looks pretty good, but you need way more links. i like links, a lot.
Icomment	love the last one, not crazy about the first one. maybe a picture of whales plotting against us in thier underwater lairs? or whales demonstrating their technology by strapping weapons to themselves?
Pscore	8(xsd:double)
Ccomment	this is an article that should be absolutely horrible. but its not....so good job...?
Cscore	7(xsd:double)
Mscore	9(xsd:double)
Hcomment	some great laughs here, especially given its length.
Iscore	7(xsd:double)
Hscore	9(xsd:integer)
Fcomment	very nicely done. stands by itself, it doesn't seem to need padding just for length's sake. i think i'll head on over to VFH and give it a vote.
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/yFN67gnsWPKFr390CT1mxA==
Signature	--09-23
abstract	I've been working on this one a bit, and I was wondering how it looks? Good, bad, funny, lame? Your opinions and suggestions for improvement are greatly appreciated.

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software