About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Grueslayer (2nd review)

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Grueslayer (2nd review) Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

So, it's not that I wasn't satisfied with the last review or anything...okay, yeah, it was kinda that. The review wasn't fleshed out enough. I really need an in-depth, lengthy review for this kind of thing. So anyway, same rules as last time: just review the Easy Mode, rate everything about it, and please dole out suggestions for what's already there and for future content. Me and Trar would really appreciate it. --Skate1168 21:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC) --Skate1168 23:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC) -- 17:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Grueslayer (2nd review)
rdfs:comment	So, it's not that I wasn't satisfied with the last review or anything...okay, yeah, it was kinda that. The review wasn't fleshed out enough. I really need an in-depth, lengthy review for this kind of thing. So anyway, same rules as last time: just review the Easy Mode, rate everything about it, and please dole out suggestions for what's already there and for future content. Me and Trar would really appreciate it. --Skate1168 21:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC) --Skate1168 23:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC) -- 17:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
dcterms:subject	Pee Review
Mcomment	I didn't actually win but I tried for a while.
Pcomment	Perfect layout, just like DOS.
Icomment	Great images there aren't many but its suppoesed to be like that
Pscore	10(xsd:integer)
Ccomment	Great idea love it!
Cscore	9(xsd:integer)
Hcomment	VERY VERY funny. One of my favorites.
Iscore	10(xsd:integer)
Hscore	10(xsd:integer)
Fcomment	Overall it's fantastic probably couldn't get any better!
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/W88zu5x_9U19J4KDt9ZzoA== dbkwik:resource/yFN67gnsWPKFr390CT1mxA==
Signature	--02-21
abstract	So, it's not that I wasn't satisfied with the last review or anything...okay, yeah, it was kinda that. The review wasn't fleshed out enough. I really need an in-depth, lengthy review for this kind of thing. So anyway, same rules as last time: just review the Easy Mode, rate everything about it, and please dole out suggestions for what's already there and for future content. Me and Trar would really appreciate it. Whoops, sorry if you think that I did not give a good review. I guess next time I will just say it is a bad game. OK so you did hurt my feelings. ;( I thought your game was nice and this is what I get. ;(--Skate1168 21:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC) It's just that he wants some advice on how to improve it. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 21:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Yeah, someone just told me that on my Talk Page, thanks! I am sorry that I suck at reviewing articles ;(--Skate1168 23:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Look, I'm sorry and all, and I do appreciate your input, but I need a seriously deep review for something like this. You don't suck, you just need to be more comprehensive. Don't worry, I feel a lot better now, and I understand. Two very nice users, named Tagstit and UU are giving me some tips about, reviewing and making templates.Oh! check out my NEW signature. -- 17:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC) Cool. Just editing this one last time so people know it hasn't already been booked.

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software