Apparently I can't spell, punctuate or format properly. Tell me what a retard I am after reading the latest bullshit Sog1970 17:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Top of the morning to you citizen, within 24 hours we will have sorted all your review related trouser difficulties.--ChiefjusticeDS 08:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Rough Guide to Gotham City
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Apparently I can't spell, punctuate or format properly. Tell me what a retard I am after reading the latest bullshit Sog1970 17:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Top of the morning to you citizen, within 24 hours we will have sorted all your review related trouser difficulties.--ChiefjusticeDS 08:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| - My overall grade of the article
|
| Pcomment
| - Your spelling and grammar do need some work but I have seen worse before. The best thing for you to do now is to proofread your article very carefully. If you have done so already and think that it is still in need of work, or you don't have the time or knowledge to do a completely thorough check then just place this template: and a member of The Uncyclopedia Proofreading Service will soon be along to assist you. Remember that you can help out and make things easier for yourself by reading aloud and identify the bigger trouble spots. As far as formatting goes you do reasonably well, just make sure the images don't squeeze the text into just going down the centre, consider removing a couple and moving them all to the right hand side. This would please strange people like myself . Also try not to break the text too much as the article begins to feel disjointed. These issues are all generally minor and the formatting isn't bad overall.
|
| Icomment
| - Your images are pretty good, but you need to make sure the captions follow the text into any changes in tone or humour. The images themselves are fine and make plenty of sense, though you may want to consider removing, maybe one, as a couple feel less necessary than the others, when choosing which one should go be harsh with yourself, and use HTBFANJS if you are stuck. However your images are generally good and the above criticisms only lose you 1 mark, with formatting problems losing you the other one.
|
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - It is a pretty good concept and you carry it off with some degree of success. My advice as far as your tone is concerned is that you continue to write in the first person, but try to make the article more like an actual guide to a city, or attraction. To that end, remove any language that directly criticises any of the attractions or belittles them directly. Also, the profanity spells a quick end to any tone that attempts to inform from a position of authority.
|
| Cscore
| |
| Mscore
| |
| Hcomment
| |
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - You have an article here that is certainly well on it's way to being excellent. Just make sure you continue your good work on this article, and you fulfil the potential it undoubtedly has. If you have any comments about the review then feel free to contact me on my talk page. Good luck making any changes.
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Signature
| |
| abstract
| - Apparently I can't spell, punctuate or format properly. Tell me what a retard I am after reading the latest bullshit Sog1970 17:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC) Top of the morning to you citizen, within 24 hours we will have sorted all your review related trouser difficulties.--ChiefjusticeDS 08:16, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)