A reviewer who actually knows who he is would be preferable, but I imagine that would be pretty rare. I'm mostly looking for criticism telling me which jokes that don't work and should be removed, so I can trim it down to a shorter article and get it featured with the votes of those who throw their laptop out the window at the sight of a slightly lengthy article. Thanks... 20:51, January 7, 2010 (UTC) I've read the entire thing. The review may be ready by tomarrow or the next day, depending on how long it will take. But I won't take forever-- 01:28, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Christian Bale
|
| rdfs:comment
| - A reviewer who actually knows who he is would be preferable, but I imagine that would be pretty rare. I'm mostly looking for criticism telling me which jokes that don't work and should be removed, so I can trim it down to a shorter article and get it featured with the votes of those who throw their laptop out the window at the sight of a slightly lengthy article. Thanks... 20:51, January 7, 2010 (UTC) I've read the entire thing. The review may be ready by tomarrow or the next day, depending on how long it will take. But I won't take forever-- 01:28, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Mcomment
| - My overall grade of this article
|
| Pcomment
| - I saw a few grammar errors. I do not know if you did it on purpose or not, but your have made misspellings of characterization, realizing, and defense, and so one. It would be wise to go over your article with spell check of have someone from the proofreading service check it for you.
|
| Icomment
| - All your images support your article well, although you may want to move them to the other side of the article. This will make the article look nicer. Also the two images with Kermit the Frog should be made a little bigger.
|
| Pscore
| |
| Ccomment
| - Honestly, the article was like damn awesome. You’ve stuck with the concept the entire time, and never went off-subject.
|
| Cscore
| |
| Mscore
| |
| Hcomment
| |
| Iscore
| |
| Hscore
| |
| Fcomment
| - There wasn’t many mistakes, only a few. Anyway I think you got yourself a swell article. I mean, I went over the entire article and did not find much faults in it. This would be considered VFH worthy. It would also be better f you got a second opinion on this. If you have any questions and/or comments, just go to my talk page. If I did not get a whole lot of information on the review, I can always review it again if you like. Good Luck!
|
| dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Signature
| |
| abstract
| - A reviewer who actually knows who he is would be preferable, but I imagine that would be pretty rare. I'm mostly looking for criticism telling me which jokes that don't work and should be removed, so I can trim it down to a shorter article and get it featured with the votes of those who throw their laptop out the window at the sight of a slightly lengthy article. Thanks... 20:51, January 7, 2010 (UTC) And preferably a review that focuses on the article at hand, rather than one about ireland, plese. Many thanks -- 13:17, January 13, 2010 (UTC) I got this, give me up to 48 hours or more.-- 20:20, January 18, 2010 (UTC) Many thanks, duder. Feel free to take upto 72 hours writing the review. I'll allow 45 minutes a day to eat and sleep, so spend them wisely. -- 20:47, January 18, 2010 (UTC) I've read the entire thing. The review may be ready by tomarrow or the next day, depending on how long it will take. But I won't take forever-- 01:28, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)