About: RuneScape:Featured images/File:Goshima filter.png   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Description: The border town of Edgeville, as viewed through the dreary Goshima filter Reason: A nice example of one of the new filters; its not as spectacular as some of the others but it demonstrates the filter effect while keeping the subject clear

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Featured images/File:Goshima filter.png
rdfs:comment
  • Description: The border town of Edgeville, as viewed through the dreary Goshima filter Reason: A nice example of one of the new filters; its not as spectacular as some of the others but it demonstrates the filter effect while keeping the subject clear
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Description: The border town of Edgeville, as viewed through the dreary Goshima filter Reason: A nice example of one of the new filters; its not as spectacular as some of the others but it demonstrates the filter effect while keeping the subject clear * Support - As nominator File:Magic logs detail.pngIsobelJFile:Raw rocktail detail.png 16:44, May 16, 2017 (UTC) * Strong oppose - Looks dull and grey, it's not a "real" thing in-game and it's just not a fantastic image, with the huge part-of-building on the left. Fswe1 17:28, May 16, 2017 (UTC) What kind of reason is "it's not a real thing"? Skyboxes and filters are in-game content, and there's no reason why we shouldn't feature them (I rather think that we should feature graphic effects like this). File:Magic logs detail.pngIsobelJFile:Raw rocktail detail.png 17:51, May 16, 2017 (UTC) A fine reason if you ask me; if we want to feature an image of Edgeville, we should use an image of what Edgeville actually looks like, the currently posted image has a colour overlay that doesn't represent the location as it appears in-game. But even discarding that argument, I stand by my stance that the place looks incredibly boring and grey, and that the angle is...well, not FIMG-worthy. Fswe1 17:53, May 16, 2017 (UTC) * Weak oppose - I don't have a problem with the muted colors, but the subject matter is pretty uninteresting. I also disagree with Fswe's comment that "we should use an image of what Edgeville actually looks like"; we're featuring an example of a filter, not an image of Edgeville. --Iiii I I I 03:46, May 17, 2017 (UTC) * Oppose, for now - I don't actually mind seeing some cool featured images using the new filters... But this is not a good example of one. It's way too dull. Haidro (talk) 13:25, May 18, 2017 (UTC) * Closed - File:X mark.svg Image will not be featured. --LiquidTalk 03:59, May 23, 2017 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software