About: RuneScape talk:ProblemReports/17359   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

I agree, PvP armour should not be put up in the main table because of it's disintegration, however it should be in the notes underneath saying that it has higher statistics, however it will disappear after an hour. File:Ancient talisman.png I R Zaros Talk 18:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC) ___________ Jpc: Yeah I notice now that is there, was it always there? I hadn't seen it before :P except it's still like the wrong way around, the PvP armour is in the main :o File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk12:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape talk:ProblemReports/17359
rdfs:comment
  • I agree, PvP armour should not be put up in the main table because of it's disintegration, however it should be in the notes underneath saying that it has higher statistics, however it will disappear after an hour. File:Ancient talisman.png I R Zaros Talk 18:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC) ___________ Jpc: Yeah I notice now that is there, was it always there? I hadn't seen it before :P except it's still like the wrong way around, the PvP armour is in the main :o File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk12:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • I agree, PvP armour should not be put up in the main table because of it's disintegration, however it should be in the notes underneath saying that it has higher statistics, however it will disappear after an hour. File:Ancient talisman.png I R Zaros Talk 18:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC) ___________ Jpc: Yeah I notice now that is there, was it always there? I hadn't seen it before :P except it's still like the wrong way around, the PvP armour is in the main :o The table is accurate in its purpose, and any reader with questions would most likely scroll down and notice the footnotes. Here is the message I sent the user in explanation: "Jpcindahouse, Thank you for noting this issue. This is not an issue of inaccurate content, but rather an opinion on whether the content presented is misleading. It is true that the table showing the highest possible Ranged attack bonus does contain several expensive degradable items which would make such equipment highly impractical and unattainable for most players. However, the purpose of the table is simply to display the items which give the highest Ranged attack bonus for each type of equipment. In order to clarify and to provide more useful information to players who are not wealthy enough to use the degradable armor, there is a section of footnotes below the table which give the best non-degradable pieces of equipment. I believe that Armadyl armor is the best non-degradable armor (replacing Morrigan's), and a crystal bow or rune crossbow with an unholy book are options for replacing Morrigan's javelins. As it is, the section will not be altered because other information is present on the page to address the problems you noted, however, your report is appreciated. Thank you, Gangsterls RuneScape Wiki" File:Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls File:Divination-icon.png talk12:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software