About: Top 11 Worst Movie Sequels   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbkwik:resource/xoykDFxJFBgF02W_HRnEzw==, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

NC: (low voice, almost mumbling) Hello, I'm the Nostalgia Critic. I remember it so you don't have to. I'm sorry I don't look my best, but seeing how we did the Top 11 Best Movie Sequels of all time, it only figures to do the Top 11 Worst. And guess what? (gets agitated) There's a few more than Top 11, so we had to do the absolute worst! (voice suddenly cracks) And I'm not ready! NC (vo): In some respects, sequels are very difficult to do, trying to capture the magic of something people clearly liked and trying to make lightning strike twice while also taking the idea to a new level.

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • Top 11 Worst Movie Sequels
rdfs:comment
  • NC: (low voice, almost mumbling) Hello, I'm the Nostalgia Critic. I remember it so you don't have to. I'm sorry I don't look my best, but seeing how we did the Top 11 Best Movie Sequels of all time, it only figures to do the Top 11 Worst. And guess what? (gets agitated) There's a few more than Top 11, so we had to do the absolute worst! (voice suddenly cracks) And I'm not ready! NC (vo): In some respects, sequels are very difficult to do, trying to capture the magic of something people clearly liked and trying to make lightning strike twice while also taking the idea to a new level.
dcterms:subject
Row 4 info
Row 1 info
  • 2017-01-17(xsd:date)
Row 4 title
  • Next Review
Row 2 info
  • 1734.0
Row 1 title
  • Released
Row 5 info
Row 2 title
  • Running time
Row 5 title
  • Link
Row 3 info
Row 3 title
  • Previous review
Box Title
  • Top 11 Worst Movie Sequels
dbkwik:thatguywith...iPageUsesTemplate
Image size
  • 320(xsd:integer)
Image File
  • OWpD96X-620x330.jpg
abstract
  • NC: (low voice, almost mumbling) Hello, I'm the Nostalgia Critic. I remember it so you don't have to. I'm sorry I don't look my best, but seeing how we did the Top 11 Best Movie Sequels of all time, it only figures to do the Top 11 Worst. And guess what? (gets agitated) There's a few more than Top 11, so we had to do the absolute worst! (voice suddenly cracks) And I'm not ready! NC (vo): In some respects, sequels are very difficult to do, trying to capture the magic of something people clearly liked and trying to make lightning strike twice while also taking the idea to a new level. NC (vo): But many sequels not only fail at that, but pour salt in the wound of annoyance. NC: There's clearly more bad sequels out there than good sequels, so let's go ahead and determine how these'll be judged. NC (vo): We're gonna be comparing how much the sequel let down the previous film or films. It also has to have been shown in theaters and come from a series that started with promise. NC (vo): We knew nothing could improve Twilight, so why would it be a letdown if the sequels were bad? NC (vo): These are the films that could've been a contender, but instead turned into a con-blunder. What's that? (a shot of Terry from On the Waterfront, played by Marlon Brando, saying "I coulda' been a contender", is shown) That was a bad add-on to something popular you loved? Well, then, I got you in just the right mood! We're gonna look at the Top 11 Worst Movie Continuations Ever! NC: Why Top 11? Because Top 80 would go too long! This is the Top 11 Worst Sequels!
is Row 4 info of
is Row 3 info of
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software