I think we should not make any more admins until we have more users as 3 out of the 5 active users are already active admins.--Bigm279301:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC) I dont honestly see whats the matter with having more admins. There are not really any downsides as the only thing it does is make any administrative functions flow quicker and actually help the wiki in regardless to vandalism and deletions. RoyalOrleans 01:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC) The thing is if everyone is an admin then new users will request adminship faster and there is an increased chance of block and edit wars.--Bigm279301:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Still that is speculation, we do not know weather new user will until it actually happens. Also the increase in administrators would most likely do nothing to effect edit war's
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
| - Call of Duty Wiki:War Room/Archive1
|
| rdfs:comment
| - I think we should not make any more admins until we have more users as 3 out of the 5 active users are already active admins.--Bigm279301:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC) I dont honestly see whats the matter with having more admins. There are not really any downsides as the only thing it does is make any administrative functions flow quicker and actually help the wiki in regardless to vandalism and deletions. RoyalOrleans 01:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC) The thing is if everyone is an admin then new users will request adminship faster and there is an increased chance of block and edit wars.--Bigm279301:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Still that is speculation, we do not know weather new user will until it actually happens. Also the increase in administrators would most likely do nothing to effect edit war's
|
| dcterms:subject
| |
| dbkwik:callofduty/...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| Games
| - Call of Duty 2
- Call of Duty 9,000: Epic Violence
|
| Weapon
| |
| Name
| |
| id-fc
| |
| Info
| - This user, , has been awarded the Medal of Honor by on for .
|
| Rank
| - Private
- Private, though probably later promoted to at least Private First Class because of all the combat he was in
|
| border-c
| |
| id-s
| |
| AKA
| |
| Affiliations
| |
| info-c
| |
| id-c
| |
| ID
| |
| info-s
| |
| Death
| |
| info-fc
| |
| Birth
| |
| border-s
| |
| abstract
| - I think we should not make any more admins until we have more users as 3 out of the 5 active users are already active admins.--Bigm279301:25, 13 May 2008 (UTC) I dont honestly see whats the matter with having more admins. There are not really any downsides as the only thing it does is make any administrative functions flow quicker and actually help the wiki in regardless to vandalism and deletions. RoyalOrleans 01:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC) The thing is if everyone is an admin then new users will request adminship faster and there is an increased chance of block and edit wars.--Bigm279301:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Still that is speculation, we do not know weather new user will until it actually happens. Also the increase in administrators would most likely do nothing to effect edit war's. Also what I see happening is that Since more editors would have administrative powers blocks could be more easily over turned and oversights will lead to more responsible blocks. And I fail to see how more admins would result in greater edit wars. RoyalOrleans 02:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC) A wiki this size does not need 5 admins. One b'crat and 2 admins is enough.--Bigm279302:23, 13 May 2008 (UTC) You still fail to give a reason why any more administrators would be a "Bad" thing. RoyalOrleans 02:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Here's a good reason: As Bigm and Fedarated have shown, admins here seem to get into block fights on a semi-regular basis. If we had more admins, it may escalate from semi-regular block fights to a block war. File:US Army WWII MSGT.pngSgt. ChiafriendRifleman 03:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Thats exactly what I said but Bones said that won't happen--Bigm279309:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC) With more admins any resulting fight of one of two admins would result in someone being able to intervene. I also blame the last fight on a lack of "guidelines/rules" and a over tendency to block (no offense). As Again multiple administrators will provide different points of view to any administrative action and will be able to intervene. Also Chia we have TWO active admins that get into a fights somewhat often. Seeing the actions of two people in a fight should hardly be used to judge against others. RoyalOrleans 19:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC) One more admin would be fine and that should be either Bones or Jack, cause they both are devoted to fixing grammar, rewording articles to remove "I" or "Me", and they both do many cleenups. One more admin would be fine.
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)