Cometstyles, Freakatone, and Me Potter Fan have all not edited in a few months. While they may return one day (I certainly hope they do!), in the mean time, I think we need some more admins to hold down the fort. There's currently only four active admins (Cavalier One, DarkJedi613, John Reaves, and Matoro183), and that's probably not enough to cover the Wiki at all times, given today's vandal attack. When there's no admin logged on, the wiki is vulnerable to organized attacks, and all that logged-on non-admins can do is keeping reverting until an admin comes. I think we need a larger pool of active admins to ensure there's a greater chance someone will be logged on when stuff like this happens. ★ Starstuff (Owl me!) 19:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Harry Potter Wiki talk:Administrators
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Cometstyles, Freakatone, and Me Potter Fan have all not edited in a few months. While they may return one day (I certainly hope they do!), in the mean time, I think we need some more admins to hold down the fort. There's currently only four active admins (Cavalier One, DarkJedi613, John Reaves, and Matoro183), and that's probably not enough to cover the Wiki at all times, given today's vandal attack. When there's no admin logged on, the wiki is vulnerable to organized attacks, and all that logged-on non-admins can do is keeping reverting until an admin comes. I think we need a larger pool of active admins to ensure there's a greater chance someone will be logged on when stuff like this happens. ★ Starstuff (Owl me!) 19:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
|
| dbkwik:harry-potte...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dbkwik:harrypotter...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Cometstyles, Freakatone, and Me Potter Fan have all not edited in a few months. While they may return one day (I certainly hope they do!), in the mean time, I think we need some more admins to hold down the fort. There's currently only four active admins (Cavalier One, DarkJedi613, John Reaves, and Matoro183), and that's probably not enough to cover the Wiki at all times, given today's vandal attack. When there's no admin logged on, the wiki is vulnerable to organized attacks, and all that logged-on non-admins can do is keeping reverting until an admin comes. I think we need a larger pool of active admins to ensure there's a greater chance someone will be logged on when stuff like this happens. ★ Starstuff (Owl me!) 19:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC) Agreed. -- Seth Cooper Owl Post 19:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC) I just saw this and ask to be an admin. I am from Denmark and when it's night where all of you are, it's day where i am. --Danniesen August 21 2010 20:02 (the time in Denmark) Can I be an admin Taowa2 16:52, March 6, 2011 (UTC)taowa2 Hi. I am wondering if I could be an admin. I would like to focus on making sure vandalism doesn't continue. minicurls the awesome (talk) 22:54, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)