| rdfs:comment
| - Hi everyone. I'm nominating Catcrewser for adminship. Catcrewser has been here since 1 November 2008, which means that he's been on the wiki for 11 months now, which is a relatively long time. Looking through his contributions, it is obvious that Catcrewser is very active in our community discussions, an active article contributor, as well as being familiar with how the wiki works and its policies. I believe that Catcrewser being an administrator would definitely benefit the wiki, as evidenced from his many administrator requests, a request that would be of interest is this one where he requested closure for many YG topics (correctly), and thus demonstrates understanding of consensus. I'd also like to point out that when I asked Catcrewser if he had any need of admin tools on his talkpage,
|
| abstract
| - Hi everyone. I'm nominating Catcrewser for adminship. Catcrewser has been here since 1 November 2008, which means that he's been on the wiki for 11 months now, which is a relatively long time. Looking through his contributions, it is obvious that Catcrewser is very active in our community discussions, an active article contributor, as well as being familiar with how the wiki works and its policies. I believe that Catcrewser being an administrator would definitely benefit the wiki, as evidenced from his many administrator requests, a request that would be of interest is this one where he requested closure for many YG topics (correctly), and thus demonstrates understanding of consensus. I'd also like to point out that when I asked Catcrewser if he had any need of admin tools on his talkpage, he gave a very mature and well thought-out reply, which further shows that he would be a mature and responsible administrator. I trust his judgement and believe that he is more than capable of makign the right call in situations. All the best to Catcrewser in this nomination. C.ChiamTalk 13:38, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
|