About: RuneScape:Article of the Month/Kalphite Queen   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Good article on a monster. Has good information. May need (a little) more pictures though. =/ SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs Weak oppose I think because we just did a featured article on a monster, that mabye we should wait before doing another monster as a featured article. Tesfan 03:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose Same reason. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 'Oppose I agree with the above; also, the page lacks an infobox, which I consider vital. Mathwhiz90601 00:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • RuneScape:Article of the Month/Kalphite Queen
rdfs:comment
  • Good article on a monster. Has good information. May need (a little) more pictures though. =/ SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs Weak oppose I think because we just did a featured article on a monster, that mabye we should wait before doing another monster as a featured article. Tesfan 03:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose Same reason. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 'Oppose I agree with the above; also, the page lacks an infobox, which I consider vital. Mathwhiz90601 00:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Good article on a monster. Has good information. May need (a little) more pictures though. =/ SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs Weak oppose I think because we just did a featured article on a monster, that mabye we should wait before doing another monster as a featured article. Tesfan 03:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose Same reason. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC) So? If it's good, it should be featured even if it is the same as before. SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Yes, it's good, but it's not the only good article we have. Someone one looking at the featured article for this month might get the wrong impression that the only good articles we have are monster articles. Tesfan 14:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 'Oppose I agree with the above; also, the page lacks an infobox, which I consider vital. Mathwhiz90601 00:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software