Good article on a monster. Has good information. May need (a little) more pictures though. =/ SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs Weak oppose I think because we just did a featured article on a monster, that mabye we should wait before doing another monster as a featured article. Tesfan 03:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose Same reason. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 'Oppose I agree with the above; also, the page lacks an infobox, which I consider vital. Mathwhiz90601 00:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Attributes | Values |
---|
rdfs:label
| - RuneScape:Article of the Month/Kalphite Queen
|
rdfs:comment
| - Good article on a monster. Has good information. May need (a little) more pictures though. =/ SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs Weak oppose I think because we just did a featured article on a monster, that mabye we should wait before doing another monster as a featured article. Tesfan 03:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose Same reason. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC) 'Oppose I agree with the above; also, the page lacks an infobox, which I consider vital. Mathwhiz90601 00:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
|
dbkwik:rune-scape/...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
dbkwik:runescape/p...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
abstract
| - Good article on a monster. Has good information. May need (a little) more pictures though. =/ SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs Weak oppose I think because we just did a featured article on a monster, that mabye we should wait before doing another monster as a featured article. Tesfan 03:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Oppose Same reason. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC) So? If it's good, it should be featured even if it is the same as before. SyugecinFile:Dragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Yes, it's good, but it's not the only good article we have. Someone one looking at the featured article for this month might get the wrong impression that the only good articles we have are monster articles. Tesfan 14:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 'Oppose I agree with the above; also, the page lacks an infobox, which I consider vital. Mathwhiz90601 00:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
|