About: Constructed Religions Discussions   Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

Well i do not see any negative response from the so called created religions makers. You noticed that I have created a second wiki interlinked with religion wiki . I have discussed this first on this wiki here. Besides that I was not the only one with coming up with this discussion. Before I came in this wiki Other Users and admins too. Besides implenting articles. I have improved the wiki not only in design but also in the interest of other people. Ever checked the page views and contributions? --Friso Yoyon Schaap(Talk) • (Religion Wiki Administrator) 10:23, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Constructed Religions Discussions
rdfs:comment
  • Well i do not see any negative response from the so called created religions makers. You noticed that I have created a second wiki interlinked with religion wiki . I have discussed this first on this wiki here. Besides that I was not the only one with coming up with this discussion. Before I came in this wiki Other Users and admins too. Besides implenting articles. I have improved the wiki not only in design but also in the interest of other people. Ever checked the page views and contributions? --Friso Yoyon Schaap(Talk) • (Religion Wiki Administrator) 10:23, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
dcterms:subject
dbkwik:religion/pr...iPageUsesTemplate
abstract
  • Well i do not see any negative response from the so called created religions makers. You noticed that I have created a second wiki interlinked with religion wiki . I have discussed this first on this wiki here. Besides that I was not the only one with coming up with this discussion. Before I came in this wiki Other Users and admins too. Besides implenting articles. I have improved the wiki not only in design but also in the interest of other people. Ever checked the page views and contributions? Concerning the wikipedia articles I have stated earlier that a lot of articles on wikipedia are too long and should split up in decent sup articles connected with a menu template. That is what i am currently doing. Gathering good information about several religion subjects and redesigning the articles in normal propotion. an example is the article Desmond Tutu This article is to long on wikipedia. Here in Religion Wiki I have splitted up this article. It will take a lot of discussions for the finally decission to split it up in several articles on wikipedia This has also draw attention from (former) wikipedians. Like User:Granpa a big wikipedia contributor. He has recently joined us. Most of his (deleted) wikipedia are here now and he is working on it daily. And I certainly don't think I have destroyed this community. You can check my talkpages and see that our users are asking me often for aid in their journey on religion Wiki. Besides that you never complained on my talkpage on certain issues. I have also contacted the first admin and founder of this wiki on his talkpage and his website (Mattis Manzel) and asked for his opinion about the constructed religions and for helping us in this wiki. Sadly he has no time anymore but was agree with me too. former admin Fr.Gareth Hughes has left the community too. I have contacted him in Wikipedia and his personal mail. I think the reason that he left is because of the constructed religion section. I have tracked also his history editing and noticed he was debating a lot on this subject. You where also mentioning that before me most articles where concerning constructed religions. This is not true. At that time former admin Gareth Hughes had by far the most edits and his contribution was mainly on christian related subjects. Anglicanism and syriac christianity if I am not mistaken. Concerning Admin rights I have stated that I would improve this wiki. When I see the page views and contributions I think I have succeeded. Besides me also other registered users are contributing almost daily. Wich was not the case a few years ago. Besides that I have designed around this project a whole website with it's own domain.the website is not finnished yet but from my statistics I know that the website is getting a lot of hits too. I have discussed major issues with the community here in democratic way. We should follow the community not only your opinion. I have also discussed issues concerning MediaWiki with the Wikia staff. Wikia Staff is aware what we are doing in Religion Wiki. The Wikia staff has also stated that the community is responsible what is going on in a Wiki. I haven't seen you contributing here as an Admin. Since April 2009 You haven't done any useful editing on this wiki. If you are not interested anymore in religionwiki and the opinions from others you should better give up your Admin/sysop rights and create your personal wiki. In the way how you are responding to me and accusing me that I have destroyed this project I see that as an Insult. Rev Bem —I really regret giving you sysop status If I am not mistaken I have voted and recommended you to the Wikia Staff for sysop status because at that time you where the only active contributor and longer on this wiki then me. When I came here (April 21, 2009) the main (former) sysops where inactive. Since then I haven't seen you around giving support to our users or any large contributions. not to mention supporting and creating new templates. I have even supported the constructed religion contributors. I am not raising my self up but this is the job what an Admin/sysops should do. Till now I have administrated this wiki and the dutch religion wiki almost alone (with some help from the wikia staff)Luckely Simon Peter Hughes has joined us and is a frequently contributor in admin/sysop issues and correcting the english grammar and spelling. The few active constructed religion registerered contributors had no problems with transferring the articles to this new wiki besides that both wiki's are interlinked with eachother from the front page. If you are dissagree with me and the others in this discussion feel free with creating your own Wiki and give up your admin rights. Nowadays you can create automatically a wiki on Wikia. Wikia staff has stated that the wiki belongs to their community and they are taking the decisions. We are a community for all religions and controversy on religions but for infant religions such as Parody Religions is not place in religion Wiki. but in the Create your Religion Wiki. --Friso Yoyon Schaap(Talk) • (Religion Wiki Administrator) 10:23, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
Alternative Linked Data Views: ODE     Raw Data in: CXML | CSV | RDF ( N-Triples N3/Turtle JSON XML ) | OData ( Atom JSON ) | Microdata ( JSON HTML) | JSON-LD    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software