Pretty much every statement needs an authoritative resource. If it does not have one, or could not be personally confirmed by the editor, please use the Fact template: {{Fact|reason="explanation"}} Feel free to include a suitable explanation or the resource, that should contain the reference (for example, a book you have not read, but is quoted by Wikipedia). In general, you should refrain from quoting unsourced statements - a good exception would be historical statements of little controversy. Over time, most of the missing references should be corrected. Please use wisely.
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Austrianeconomics:Citation
|
| rdfs:comment
| - Pretty much every statement needs an authoritative resource. If it does not have one, or could not be personally confirmed by the editor, please use the Fact template: {{Fact|reason="explanation"}} Feel free to include a suitable explanation or the resource, that should contain the reference (for example, a book you have not read, but is quoted by Wikipedia). In general, you should refrain from quoting unsourced statements - a good exception would be historical statements of little controversy. Over time, most of the missing references should be corrected. Please use wisely.
|
| dbkwik:austrianeco...iPageUsesTemplate
| |
| abstract
| - Pretty much every statement needs an authoritative resource. If it does not have one, or could not be personally confirmed by the editor, please use the Fact template: {{Fact|reason="explanation"}} Feel free to include a suitable explanation or the resource, that should contain the reference (for example, a book you have not read, but is quoted by Wikipedia). In general, you should refrain from quoting unsourced statements - a good exception would be historical statements of little controversy. Over time, most of the missing references should be corrected. Please use wisely. See also the Austrian Economics:FAQ and the Wikipedia:Verifiability standard.
|