About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/DuckDuckGo

Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/DuckDuckGo Sponge Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : 134.155.108.49:8890 associated with source dataset(s)

This is my first Uncyclopedia article, and I am wondering whether this is upto the mark. I would also appreciate it if you would advise me as to whether I should increase this article's length or not. Thank you. Vavaunni (talk) 11:10, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/DuckDuckGo
rdfs:comment	This is my first Uncyclopedia article, and I am wondering whether this is upto the mark. I would also appreciate it if you would advise me as to whether I should increase this article's length or not. Thank you. Vavaunni (talk) 11:10, January 7, 2015 (UTC)
dcterms:subject	Pee Review Reviewed
dbkwik:uncyclopedi...iPageUsesTemplate	dbkwik:resource/ecBfmBSLpzUHbRmxpGH2Aw== dbkwik:resource/ZoHSiVvOPCmsGpW_Y4LXYA== dbkwik:resource/xc7u1fdqAV-rYxf9jXVckg== dbkwik:resource/bONnwXolcnxU0QdQmV_Rbg==
ReviewLite	As a general rule, try to avoid using first/second person. Particularly in the section 'Dumb Policies' you use 'I' a lot. I think in the guidelines it suggests only using first person when going off track or something. And in the user interface you refer to: the user of duckduckgo/the reader as 'you' whereas you could probably change that to 'the user' for instance. Apart from that, the satire is appropriate. I found myself laughing when I read the description of the "stuck-up, conceited and inane bowtie-wearing" duck, juxtaposed with the picture on the right. Might not be the funniest, but it sure is funny. But it's awfully short. Make 'Motto' one of the things on the table on the right, and merge some other sections together. you can definitly merge the description with the top of the page. You need to make it longer. yeah. maybe go into some previous history about how it was created.
Signature	--12-08
abstract	This is my first Uncyclopedia article, and I am wondering whether this is upto the mark. I would also appreciate it if you would advise me as to whether I should increase this article's length or not. Thank you. Vavaunni (talk) 11:10, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3217, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Standard Edition
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2012 OpenLink Software